• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续血流左心室辅助装置相关并发症患者的心脏移植结局。

Heart transplantation outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device-related complications.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jan;34(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2014.07.015
PMID:25150620
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Device-related complications (DRC) can develop in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). We studied the heart transplant (HTx) outcomes of United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) Status 1A patients supported with CF-LVADs with (+) or without (-) DRCs.

METHODS

UNOS data (2006 to 2012) for patients listed under Status 1A with CF-LVADs at the time of HTx were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between the DRC+ and DRC- groups. The DRC+ group was further analyzed under 5 UNOS categories: B1 to B5.

RESULTS

Of the 6,799 patients who received HTx under 1A listing, 2,113 (31%) were supported with CF-LVADs. From 2006 to 2012, patients supported with CF-LVADs under the 1A listing increased from 11.4% to 41.5% (p = 0.0001). The DRC+ group (45%) compared with the DRC- group (55%) had longer waiting times (330 ± 323 days vs 168 ± 298 days), more patients with blood group O (57% vs 40%), and a higher body mass index (29 ± 5.5 kg/m(2) vs 27 ± 5 kg/m(2)). Most of the DRCs were in the B2 category (54%). Post-HTx survival for the DRC+ group was significantly reduced compared with the DRC- group at 1 year (85.6% vs 89.9%, p = 0.01) and at 3 years (78% vs 82.7%, p = 0.01), primarily due to B2 category.

CONCLUSIONS

An increasing number of patients receiving HTx under 1A listing are supported with CF-LVADs. DRCs are steadily increasing, with most of them from the B2 category. Post-HTx survival in DRC+ group is inferior, primarily for the B2 category. The benefits of CF-LVADs for patients awaiting HTx need to be weighed against the development of DRCs with subsequently inferior post-HTx survival.

摘要

背景

在接受连续血流左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)治疗的患者中,可能会出现器械相关并发症(DRC)。我们研究了在接受 CF-LVAD 治疗的 UNOS 1A 状态患者中,出现(+)或不出现(-)DRC 对心脏移植(HTx)结局的影响。

方法

分析了 2006 年至 2012 年期间,在 HTx 时接受 UNOS 1A 状态 CF-LVAD 治疗的患者的数据。比较 DRC+组和 DRC-组的结局。在 5 个 UNOS 类别下对 DRC+组进行了进一步分析:B1 至 B5。

结果

在 6799 名接受 1A 列表 HTx 的患者中,有 2113 名(31%)接受 CF-LVAD 治疗。2006 年至 2012 年,接受 CF-LVAD 治疗的 1A 列表患者比例从 11.4%增加到 41.5%(p = 0.0001)。与 DRC-组(55%)相比,DRC+组(45%)的等待时间更长(330±323 天比 168±298 天),血型 O 的患者更多(57%比 40%),体重指数(BMI)更高(29±5.5kg/m2比 27±5kg/m2)。大多数 DRC 发生在 B2 类别(54%)。与 DRC-组相比,DRC+组的 HTx 后 1 年(85.6%比 89.9%,p = 0.01)和 3 年(78%比 82.7%,p = 0.01)生存率显著降低,主要是由于 B2 类别。

结论

越来越多的接受 1A 列表 HTx 的患者接受 CF-LVAD 治疗。DRC 持续增加,其中大多数来自 B2 类别。DRC+组的 HTx 后生存率较低,主要是由于 B2 类别。在等待 HTx 的患者中,CF-LVAD 的益处需要与随后较差的 HTx 后生存率相关的 DRC 发展相权衡。

相似文献

1
Heart transplantation outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device-related complications.连续血流左心室辅助装置相关并发症患者的心脏移植结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jan;34(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
2
Impact of Left-Ventricular Assist Device-Related Complications on Posttransplant Graft Survival.左心室辅助装置相关并发症对移植后移植物存活的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Dec;104(6):1947-1952. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.059. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
3
Do Patients Supported With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Have a Sufficient Risk of Death to Justify a Priority Allocation? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Patients Listed in UNOS Status 2.采用持续血流左心室辅助装置支持的患者是否有足够的死亡风险来证明优先分配是合理的?在 UNOS 状态 2 中列出的患者中进行倾向评分匹配分析。
Transplantation. 2018 Jun;102(6):e288-e294. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002105.
4
Impact of insurance status on heart transplant wait-list mortality for patients with left ventricular assist devices.保险状况对左心室辅助装置患者心脏移植等待名单死亡率的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2017 Feb;31(2). doi: 10.1111/ctr.12875. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
5
Results of new-generation intrapericardial continuous flow left ventricular assist devices as a bridge-to-transplant.新一代心包内连续流左心室辅助装置作为移植桥接的结果。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 Dec;19(12):739-747. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000721.
6
Sex-Related Differences in Use and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Transplantation.性别差异对左心室辅助装置作为移植桥的使用和结局的影响。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Mar;7(3):250-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.01.008.
7
Outcome of cardiac transplantation in patients requiring prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support.需要长期持续血流左心室辅助装置支持的患者心脏移植的结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jan;34(1):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
8
Morbidity and mortality in heart transplant candidates supported with mechanical circulatory support: is reappraisal of the current United network for organ sharing thoracic organ allocation policy justified?机械循环支持支持的心脏移植候选者的发病率和死亡率:有理由重新评估当前美国器官共享网络的胸部器官分配政策吗?
Circulation. 2013 Jan 29;127(4):452-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.100123. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
9
Impact of using higher-risk donor hearts for candidates with pre-transplant mechanical circulatory support.使用具有移植前机械循环支持的高危供心对受者的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Feb;41(2):237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
10
Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.在当前接受连续流左心室辅助装置的患者中,心脏移植后的存活率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Which Is the Best Device as Bridge to Heart Transplantation?机械循环辅助装置:哪种是心脏移植桥接的最佳装置?
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Oct 8;37(5):737-743. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0562.
2
Early reduction of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients using a long-term mechanical ventricular assistance device: a cross-sectional study.使用长期机械心室辅助装置的患者肺动脉高压的早期降低:一项横断面研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 May-Jun;140(3):505-508. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0944.R2.18032022.
3
Post-Transplant Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction to Support the Use of Marginal Donor Hearts.
移植后体外膜肺氧合治疗严重原发性移植物功能障碍以支持使用边缘供体心脏。
Transpl Int. 2022 Mar 10;35:10176. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10176. eCollection 2022.
4
Assessment of machine perfusion conditions for the donation after circulatory death heart preservation.评估循环死亡后供心保存的机器灌注条件。
Artif Organs. 2022 Jul;46(7):1346-1357. doi: 10.1111/aor.14208. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
5
Impact of pretransplant left ventricular assist device support duration on outcome after heart transplantation.移植前左心室辅助装置支持时间对心脏移植后结局的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb 21;34(3):462-469. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab265.
6
A mortality risk score for heart transplants after contemporary ventricular assist device bridging.当代心室辅助装置桥接后心脏移植的死亡风险评分
J Card Surg. 2021 Feb;36(2):449-456. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15188. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
7
Vasoplegia following heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device explant is not associated with inferior outcomes.心脏移植和左心室辅助装置移除后出现的血管麻痹与不良预后无关。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2426-2434. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.53.
8
Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.左心室辅助装置植入策略与结果。
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2088-96. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.08.13.
9
Cardiac transplantation for older patients: Characteristics and outcomes in the septuagenarian population.老年患者的心脏移植:七十岁人群的特征与结局
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Mar;35(3):362-369. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.028. Epub 2015 Oct 30.