• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植前左心室辅助装置支持时间对心脏移植后结局的影响。

Impact of pretransplant left ventricular assist device support duration on outcome after heart transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Angiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb 21;34(3):462-469. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab265.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivab265
PMID:34647129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8860434/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Heart transplantation after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains challenging. It is still unclear whether its support duration impacts the outcome after transplantation.

METHODS

All patients undergoing heart transplantation between 2010 and 2021 at a single department after previous left ventricular assistance were retrospectively reviewed and divided into 4 different study groups with regard to the duration of LVAD support to examine the impact on the postoperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of n = 198 patients were included and assigned to the 4 study groups (group 1: <90 days, n = 14; group 2: 90 days to 1 year, n = 31; group 3: 1-2 years, n = 29; group 4: >2 years, n = 24). Although there were no differences between the 4 groups concerning relevant mismatch between the recipients and donors, the incidence of primary graft dysfunction was numerically increased in patients with the shortest support duration, and also those patients with >1 year of support (group 1: 35.7%, group 2: 25.8%, group 3: 41.4%, group 4: 37.5%, P = 0.63). The incidence of acute graft rejection was by trend increased in patients of group 1 (group 1: 28.6%, group 2: 3.3%, group 3: 7.1%, group 4: 12.5%, P = 0.06). Duration of LVAD support did not impact on perioperative adverse events (infections, P = 0.79; acute kidney injury, P = 0.85; neurological events, P = 0.74; thoracic bleeding, P = 0.61), neither on postoperative survival (1-year survival: group 1: 78.6%, group 2: 66.7%, group 3: 80.0%, group 4: 72.7%, P = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

We cannot identify a significant impact of the duration of pretransplant LVAD support on postoperative outcome; therefore, we cannot recommend a certain timeframe for transplantation of LVAD patients.

摘要

目的

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后的心脏移植仍然具有挑战性。其支持时间是否会影响移植后的结果仍不清楚。

方法

回顾性分析 2010 年至 2021 年期间在一个科室接受心脏移植的所有患者,这些患者在接受左心室辅助前均接受过 LVAD 治疗,将患者分为 4 个不同的研究组,根据 LVAD 支持的时间长短来检查其对术后发病率和死亡率的影响。

结果

共纳入 198 例患者,分为 4 个研究组(组 1:<90 天,n = 14;组 2:90 天至 1 年,n = 31;组 3:1-2 年,n = 29;组 4:>2 年,n = 24)。尽管在受体和供体之间的相关不匹配方面,4 组之间没有差异,但支持时间最短的患者原发性移植物功能障碍的发生率以及支持时间>1 年的患者(组 1:35.7%,组 2:25.8%,组 3:41.4%,组 4:37.5%,P = 0.63)的发生率呈上升趋势。组 1 患者的急性移植物排斥反应发生率呈上升趋势(组 1:28.6%,组 2:3.3%,组 3:7.1%,组 4:12.5%,P = 0.06)。LVAD 支持时间不影响围手术期不良事件(感染,P = 0.79;急性肾损伤,P = 0.85;神经系统事件,P = 0.74;胸出血,P = 0.61),也不影响术后生存率(1 年生存率:组 1:78.6%,组 2:66.7%,组 3:80.0%,组 4:72.7%,P = 0.74)。

结论

我们无法确定移植前 LVAD 支持时间对术后结果的显著影响;因此,我们不能推荐 LVAD 患者进行移植的特定时间范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64a/8860434/309937c7f831/ivab265f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64a/8860434/e9ccdd6fd579/ivab265f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64a/8860434/de6ebec09ad7/ivab265f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64a/8860434/309937c7f831/ivab265f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64a/8860434/e9ccdd6fd579/ivab265f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64a/8860434/de6ebec09ad7/ivab265f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64a/8860434/309937c7f831/ivab265f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of pretransplant left ventricular assist device support duration on outcome after heart transplantation.移植前左心室辅助装置支持时间对心脏移植后结局的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb 21;34(3):462-469. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab265.
2
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
3
The impact of infection among left ventricular assist device recipients on post-transplantation outcomes: A retrospective review.左心室辅助装置接受者感染对移植后结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;20(6):e12995. doi: 10.1111/tid.12995. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Does pretransplant left ventricular assist device therapy improve results after heart transplantation in patients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance?对于肺血管阻力升高的患者,移植前左心室辅助装置治疗是否能改善心脏移植后的效果?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):1029-34; discussion 1034-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.12.024. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
5
Complications of left ventricular assist devices causing high urgency status on waiting list: impact on outcome after heart transplantation.左心室辅助装置的并发症导致在等待名单上处于高度紧急状态:对心脏移植后结局的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1253-1262. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13188. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.接受高龄供体心脏移植患者与接受左心室辅助装置植入患者中期结局的前瞻性比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):584-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw164. Epub 2016 May 30.
7
Impact of donor variables on heart transplantation outcomes in mechanically bridged versus standard recipients†.机械辅助过渡受者与标准受者中供体变量对心脏移植结局的影响†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Mar 1;28(3):455-464. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy262.
8
Long-term heart transplant outcomes after lowering fixed pulmonary hypertension using left ventricular assist devices.使用左心室辅助装置降低固定性肺动脉高压后心脏移植的长期预后。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy214.
9
Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology have a positive impact on outcome pretransplant and posttransplant?持续血流左心室辅助装置技术对移植前和移植后的结果有积极影响吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Nov;82(5):1774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.079.
10
Redo sternotomy versus left ventricular assist device explant as risk factors for early mortality following heart transplantation.再次开胸与左心室辅助装置(LVAD)取出作为心脏移植术后早期死亡的危险因素。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov 1;31(5):603-610. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa180.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation on Heart Transplant Outcomes.微创左心室辅助装置植入对心脏移植结局的影响。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Spring;34(1):148-156. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Complications of left ventricular assist devices causing high urgency status on waiting list: impact on outcome after heart transplantation.左心室辅助装置的并发症导致在等待名单上处于高度紧急状态:对心脏移植后结局的影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1253-1262. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13188. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: 37th adult heart transplantation report-2020; focus on deceased donor characteristics.
国际心脏和肺移植协会国际胸科器官移植登记处:第37份成人心脏移植报告 - 2020;关注已故供体特征。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Oct;39(10):1003-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
4
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation after Heart Transplantation: Impact of Type of Cannulation.心脏移植后的体外膜肺氧合:插管类型的影响
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr;69(3):263-270. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400472. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
5
Heart transplantation in patients with ventricular assist devices: Impacts of the implantation technique and support duration.接受心室辅助装置治疗患者的心脏移植:植入技术和支持持续时间的影响
J Card Surg. 2020 Feb;35(2):352-359. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14392. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
The clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies on antibody-mediated rejection and long-term prognosis after heart transplantation.供者特异性抗体对心脏移植后抗体介导排斥反应及长期预后的临床影响。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2019 Jun;24(3):245-251. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000636.
7
Third Annual Report From the ISHLT Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry: A comparison of centrifugal and axial continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.国际心肺移植学会机械循环支持注册研究第三年度报告:离心式与轴流式连续血流左心室辅助装置的比较。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Apr;38(4):352-363. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.02.004.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断演变的适应证、结果和科学合作。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013.
9
Predicted heart mass is the optimal metric for size match in heart transplantation.预计心脏质量是心脏移植中大小匹配的最佳指标。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-fifth Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2018; Focus Theme: Multiorgan Transplantation.国际心肺移植学会国际胸科器官移植登记处:2018年第35份成人心脏移植报告;重点主题:多器官移植
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Oct;37(10):1155-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Aug 10.