Akhtar Syed, Lee Jenny S Y
1 Department of Management, City University of Hong Kong.
Psychol Rep. 2014 Aug;115(1):133-47. doi: 10.2466/08.01.PR0.115c13z5. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
This study assessed the factor structure of the Work Regulatory Focus Scale, which includes work-related prevention and promotion as dimensions of regulatory focus. To examine the concurrent validity, these dimensions were correlated with the prevention and promotion subscales of the Chronic Regulatory Focus Questionnaire. Using computer-assisted telephone interviews, data were collected from 237 full-time working people in Hong Kong, with a response rate of 72.9%. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the two-factor model of the Work Regulatory Focus Scale fit the data adequately. Fit indices improved after two of the items with low factor loadings on the promotion focus dimension were excluded from the analysis, which left 10 items in the scale. Pearson correlations between work-related regulatory focus subscales and chronic regulatory focus subscales were low but significant (range, .19-.39). The mean score differences between regulatory focus subscales were mostly in the expected direction, providing convergent validity evidence. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research on the validity of the scale were discussed.
本研究评估了工作调节焦点量表的因子结构,该量表将与工作相关的预防和促进作为调节焦点的维度。为检验同时效度,将这些维度与慢性调节焦点问卷的预防和促进子量表进行了相关性分析。通过计算机辅助电话访谈,从香港237名全职工作者中收集数据,回复率为72.9%。验证性因子分析表明,工作调节焦点量表的双因子模型与数据拟合良好。在将促进焦点维度上因子载荷较低的两个项目从分析中排除后,拟合指数有所改善,量表剩余10个项目。工作相关调节焦点子量表与慢性调节焦点子量表之间的皮尔逊相关性较低但显著(范围为0.19 - 0.39)。调节焦点子量表之间的平均分差异大多在预期方向,提供了聚合效度证据。讨论了这些发现的意义以及对该量表效度未来研究的建议。