• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电视辅助小切口活体供肾肾切除术或传统开放性肾切除术后的移植肾存活率:左右移植肾有差异吗?

Graft survival after video-assisted minilaparotomy living-donor nephrectomy or conventional open nephrectomy: do left and right allografts differ?

作者信息

Yoon Young Eun, Han Woong Kyu, Choi Kyung Hwa, Yang Seung Choul, Kim Yu Seun, Kang Dae Ryong, Huh Kyu Ha, Kim Myoung Soo, Kim Soon Il, Joo Dong Jin

机构信息

Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Transplantation Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, and Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Urology. 2014 Oct;84(4):832-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.028. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.028
PMID:25156512
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of the side of the allograft (left vs right) on early graft failure and long-term graft survival rates after conventional open living-donor nephrectomy (OLDN) or video-assisted minilaparotomy living-donor nephrectomy (VLDN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 2704 living-donor transplantations using OLDN or VLDN between 1991 and 2011 at a single institution. For analysis, the entire period was divided into "era 1" (1991-1997), when OLDN was prevalent; "era 2" (1998-2004), when both OLDN and VLDN were conducted; and "era 3" (2005-2011), when VLDN became prevalent.

RESULTS

There were 822, 650, and 685 transplantations analyzed in eras 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There were no differences in causes of early graft failure between left and right allografts in any era. The right allograft survival rate in eras 1 and 2 was slightly lower than the left allograft survival rate. In era 2, during which both OLDN and VLDN were conducted, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower right allograft survival rate for OLDN. However, the long-term survival rates of the left and right VLDN grafts did not differ.

CONCLUSION

Right OLDN allografts demonstrated worse long-term survival rate than left OLDN allografts, but the right and left VLDN allografts had similar long-term survival rate. VLDN appears to be an appropriate treatment option when right donor nephrectomy is desired.

摘要

目的

探讨在传统开放性活体供肾肾切除术(OLDN)或电视辅助小切口活体供肾肾切除术(VLDN)后,同种异体移植肾的侧别(左肾与右肾)对早期移植肾失功及长期移植肾存活率的影响。

材料与方法

我们评估了1991年至2011年在单一机构进行的2704例采用OLDN或VLDN的活体供肾移植。为进行分析,整个时间段被分为“第1阶段”(1991 - 1997年),此阶段OLDN盛行;“第2阶段”(1998 - 2004年),此阶段OLDN和VLDN均开展;以及“第3阶段”(2005 - 2011年),此阶段VLDN盛行。

结果

第1、2、3阶段分别分析了822例、650例和685例移植。在任何阶段,左右同种异体移植肾早期移植肾失功的原因均无差异。第1和第2阶段右同种异体移植肾的存活率略低于左同种异体移植肾。在第2阶段,即同时进行OLDN和VLDN的阶段,Kaplan - Meier分析显示OLDN的右同种异体移植肾存活率较低。然而,左右VLDN移植肾的长期存活率并无差异。

结论

右OLDN同种异体移植肾的长期存活率低于左OLDN同种异体移植肾,但左右VLDN同种异体移植肾的长期存活率相似。当需要进行右供肾肾切除术时,VLDN似乎是一种合适的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Graft survival after video-assisted minilaparotomy living-donor nephrectomy or conventional open nephrectomy: do left and right allografts differ?电视辅助小切口活体供肾肾切除术或传统开放性肾切除术后的移植肾存活率:左右移植肾有差异吗?
Urology. 2014 Oct;84(4):832-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.028. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
2
Standardized video-assisted retroperitoneal minilaparotomy surgery for 615 living donor nephrectomies.615 例活体供肾者采用标准化视频辅助后腹腔镜微创切肾术。
Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):973-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01295.x. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
3
Hand-assisted laparoscopic and open living donor nephrectomy in Korea.韩国的手辅助腹腔镜与开放性活体供肾切除术
Int J Urol. 2005 May;12(5):436-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01086.x.
4
Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy versus open surgery: evaluation of surgical trauma and late graft function in 82 patients.手辅助腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术与开放手术对比:82例患者手术创伤及移植肾远期功能评估
Transplant Proc. 2009 Dec;41(10):4039-43. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.08.056.
5
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the pediatric recipient in a dual-site program.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:双中心项目中的儿科受者
Pediatr Transplant. 2007 Jun;11(4):429-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00664.x.
6
Living donor kidney transplantation with multiple arteries: recent increase in modern era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.活体供肾多支动脉肾移植:腹腔镜供肾切除术现代 era 中近期的增加情况。 注:这里“era”直接保留英文未翻译,因为在医学领域一些专业术语可能会保留英文,需根据具体语境判断其含义,如果它不是专业术语,则应翻译为“时代”等更合适的词。
Arch Surg. 2009 May;144(5):472-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.49.
7
Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach in respect of early postoperative pain management.后腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:与开放手术在术后早期疼痛管理方面的比较
Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):609-12. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.219.
8
Comparison of Surgical Techniques in Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.活体供肾切取术的手术技术比较:系统评价和贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。
Ann Transplant. 2020 Oct 30;25:e926677. doi: 10.12659/AOT.926677.
9
Evaluation of right versus left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.腹腔镜下右肾与左肾供肾切除术的评估
Exp Clin Transplant. 2011 Oct;9(5):310-4.
10
Comparison of donor, and early and late recipient outcomes following hand assisted and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.手助腹腔镜与腹腔镜供肾切取术后供者、早期和晚期受者结局的比较。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.142. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the Inverted Kidney Transplantation Technique Promote the Feasibility and Safety of Right Living Donor Nephrectomy?倒置肾移植技术是否能提高右活体供肾切除术的可行性和安全性?
Turk J Urol. 2022 Jul;48(4):303-308. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22108.
2
[Right-sided or left-sided donor nephrectomy-is this really relevant?].[右侧或左侧供体肾切除术——这真的重要吗?]
Urologe A. 2020 Jan;59(1):32-39. doi: 10.1007/s00120-019-01094-8.