• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生能从去识别化的记录中认出自己的患者吗?

Can physicians recognize their own patients in de-identified notes?

作者信息

Meystre Stéphane, Shen Shuying, Hofmann Deborah, Gundlapalli Adi

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:778-82.

PMID:25160293
Abstract

The adoption of Electronic Health Records is growing at a fast pace, and this growth results in very large quantities of patient clinical information becoming available in electronic format, with tremendous potentials, but also equally growing concern for patient confidentiality breaches. De-identification of patient information has been proposed as a solution to both facilitate secondary uses of clinical information, and protect patient information confidentiality. Automated approaches based on Natural Language Processing have been implemented and evaluated, allowing for much faster text de-identification than manual approaches. A U.S. Veterans Affairs clinical text de-identification project focused on investigating the current state of the art of automatic clinical text de-identification, on developing a best-of-breed de-identification application for clinical documents, and on evaluating its impact on subsequent text uses and the risk for re-identification. To evaluate this risk, we de-identified discharge summaries from 86 patients using our 'best-of-breed' text de-identification application with resynthesis of the identifiers detected. We then asked physicians working in the ward the patients were hospitalized in if they could recognize these patients when reading the de-identified documents. Each document was examined by at least one resident and one attending physician, and with 4.65% of the documents, physicians thought they recognized the patient because of specific clinical information, but after verification, none was correctly re-identified.

摘要

电子健康记录的采用正在迅速增长,这种增长使得大量患者临床信息以电子形式可得,具有巨大潜力,但同时对患者隐私泄露的担忧也在与日俱增。患者信息去识别化被提议作为一种解决方案,既能促进临床信息的二次利用,又能保护患者信息的保密性。基于自然语言处理的自动化方法已经得到实施和评估,与手动方法相比,能实现更快的文本去识别化。一个美国退伍军人事务部临床文本去识别化项目专注于研究自动临床文本去识别化的当前技术水平,开发用于临床文档的最佳去识别化应用程序,并评估其对后续文本使用的影响以及重新识别的风险。为了评估这种风险,我们使用我们的“最佳”文本去识别化应用程序对86名患者的出院小结进行去识别化处理,并重新合成检测到的标识符。然后,我们询问患者住院病房的医生,他们在阅读去识别化文档时是否能认出这些患者。每份文档至少由一名住院医生和一名主治医生进行检查,有4.65%的文档,医生认为他们因为特定的临床信息认出了患者,但经过核实,没有一人被正确重新识别。

相似文献

1
Can physicians recognize their own patients in de-identified notes?医生能从去识别化的记录中认出自己的患者吗?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:778-82.
2
Text de-identification for privacy protection: a study of its impact on clinical text information content.用于隐私保护的文本去识别化:对其对临床文本信息内容影响的一项研究
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Aug;50:142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
3
Proposal and evaluation of FASDIM, a Fast And Simple De-Identification Method for unstructured free-text clinical records.提出并评估了 FASDIM,一种用于非结构化自由文本临床记录的快速简便去识别方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Apr;83(4):303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
4
De-identification of unstructured paper-based health records for privacy-preserving secondary use.对非结构化纸质健康记录进行去标识化处理以实现隐私保护的二次利用。
J Med Eng Technol. 2014 Jul;38(5):260-8. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2014.913080. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
A computational model to protect patient data from location-based re-identification.一种用于保护患者数据免遭基于位置的重新识别的计算模型。
Artif Intell Med. 2007 Jul;40(3):223-39. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
6
BoB, a best-of-breed automated text de-identification system for VHA clinical documents.BoB,一种针对 VHA 临床文档的最佳自动文本去识别系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):77-83. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001020. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
7
Enhanced information retrieval from narrative German-language clinical text documents using automated document classification.使用自动文档分类从德语叙述性临床文本文件中增强信息检索。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:473-8.
8
Evaluating current automatic de-identification methods with Veteran's health administration clinical documents.评估退伍军人健康管理局临床文档中当前的自动去识别方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jul 27;12:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-109.
9
Automated de-identification of free-text medical records.自由文本医疗记录的自动去识别化
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Jul 24;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-32.
10
Evaluating common de-identification heuristics for personal health information.评估个人健康信息的常见去识别启发式方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 21;8(4):e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e28.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards 'Formalising' WhatsApp Teledermatology Practice in KZ-N District Hospitals: Key Informant Interviews.迈向 KZ-N 地区医院“规范” WhatsApp 远程皮肤病学实践:关键知情人访谈。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 21;21(10):1388. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101388.
2
Nonspecific deidentification of date-like text in deidentified clinical notes enables reidentification of dates.去识别化的临床记录中类似日期的非特定信息的去识别化处理可使日期被重新识别。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1967-1971. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac147.
3
The Potential of Research Drawing on Clinical Free Text to Bring Benefits to Patients in the United Kingdom: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
利用临床自由文本进行研究为英国患者带来益处的潜力:文献系统综述
Front Digit Health. 2021 Feb 10;3:606599. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.606599. eCollection 2021.
4
Building a best-in-class automated de-identification tool for electronic health records through ensemble learning.通过集成学习构建用于电子健康记录的一流自动去识别工具。
Patterns (N Y). 2021 May 12;2(6):100255. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100255. eCollection 2021 Jun 11.
5
CAS: corpus of clinical cases in French.法语临床病例语料库。
J Biomed Semantics. 2020 Aug 6;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13326-020-00225-x.
6
De-identification of medical records using conditional random fields and long short-term memory networks.使用条件随机场和长短时记忆网络对病历进行去识别。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S43-S53. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
7
Clinical Data Reuse or Secondary Use: Current Status and Potential Future Progress.临床数据的再利用或二次使用:现状与未来潜在进展
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):38-52. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-007. Epub 2017 Sep 11.