Jakob Sérgio Ricardo, Matheus Davison, Jimenez-Pellegrin Maria Cristina, Turssi Cecília Pedroso, Amaral Flávia Lucisano Botelho
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):82-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.082-089.oar.
The aim of this study was to compare the friction between three bracket models: conventional stainless steel (Ovation, Dentsply GAC), self-ligating ceramic (In-Ovation, Denstply GAC) and self-ligating stainless steel brackets (In-Ovation R, Dentsply GAC).
Five brackets were used for each model. They were bonded to an aluminum prototype that allowed the simulation of four misalignment situations (n = 10). Three of these situations occured at the initial phase (in which a 0.016-in nickel-titanium wire was used): 1. horizontal; 2. vertical; and 3. simultaneous horizontal/vertical. One of the situations occurred at the final treatment phase: 4. no misalignment (in which a 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel rectangular wire was used). The wires slipped through the brackets and friction was measured by a Universal Testing Machine.
Analysis of variance followed by Tukey's Test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05) were applied to assess the results. Significant interaction (p < 0.01) among groups was found. For the tests that simulated initial alignment, Ovation® bracket produced the highest friction. The two self-ligating models resulted in lower and similar values, except for the horizontal situation, in which In-Ovation C® showed lower friction, which was similar to the In-Ovation R® metallic model. For the no misalignment situation, the same results were observed.
The self-ligating system was superior to the conventional one due to producing less friction. With regard to the material used for manufacturing the brackets, the In-Ovation C® ceramic model showed less friction than the metallic ones.
本研究旨在比较三种托槽模型之间的摩擦力:传统不锈钢托槽(Ovation,登士柏GAC)、自锁陶瓷托槽(In-Ovation,登士柏GAC)和自锁不锈钢托槽(In-Ovation R,登士柏GAC)。
每种模型使用五个托槽。将它们粘结到一个铝制原型上,该原型可模拟四种错位情况(n = 10)。其中三种情况发生在初始阶段(使用0.016英寸的镍钛丝):1. 水平错位;2. 垂直错位;3. 水平/垂直同时错位。一种情况发生在最终治疗阶段:4. 无错位(使用0.019×0.025英寸的不锈钢矩形丝)。钢丝滑过托槽,并用万能试验机测量摩擦力。
采用方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验(α = 0.05)来评估结果。发现组间存在显著交互作用(p < 0.01)。对于模拟初始排齐的测试,Ovation®托槽产生的摩擦力最高。两种自锁模型产生的值较低且相似,但在水平错位情况下除外,In-Ovation C®的摩擦力较低,与In-Ovation R®金属模型相似。对于无错位情况,观察到相同的结果。
自锁系统由于产生的摩擦力较小,优于传统系统。关于用于制造托槽的材料,In-Ovation C®陶瓷模型的摩擦力比金属模型小。