• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种市售自锁托槽系统摩擦特性的研究。

A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems.

作者信息

Budd Steven, Daskalogiannakis John, Tompson Bryan D

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):645-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn058. Epub 2008 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjn058
PMID:18974067
Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to assess and compare the in vitro tribological behaviour of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems. The frictional characteristics of the Damon3, Speed, In-Ovation R, and Time2 bracket systems were studied using a jig that mimics the three-dimensional movements that occur during sliding mechanics. Each bracket system was tested on the following stainless steel archwires: 0.016 x 0.022, 0.019 x 0.025, 0.020 round, and 0.021 x 0.021 inch Speed D-wire. An Instron testing machine with a 50 N load cell was used to measure the frictional resistance for each bracket/tooth assembly. The crosshead speed was set at a constant rate of 1 mm/minute, and each typodont tooth was moved along a fixed wire segment for a distance of 8 mm. Descriptive statistical analysis for each bracket/archwire combination with regard to frictional resistance was performed with a two-way, balanced analysis of variance for bracket type and wire size. The Damon3 bracket consistently demonstrated the lowest frictional resistance to sliding, while the Speed bracket produced significantly (P < 0.001) more frictional resistance than the other brackets tested for any given archwire. The self-ligation design (passive versus active) appears to be the primary variable responsible for the frictional resistance generated by self-ligating brackets during translation. Passively ligated brackets produce less frictional resistance; however, this decreased friction may result in decreased control compared with actively ligated systems.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估和比较四种市售自锁托槽系统的体外摩擦学行为。使用一种模拟滑动力学过程中发生的三维运动的夹具,研究了Damon3、Speed、In-Ovation R和Time2托槽系统的摩擦特性。每个托槽系统在以下不锈钢弓丝上进行测试:0.016×0.022、0.019×0.025、0.020圆形和0.021×0.021英寸的Speed D形丝。使用配有50 N测力传感器的Instron测试机测量每个托槽/牙齿组件的摩擦阻力。十字头速度设定为恒定的1毫米/分钟,每个模型牙沿着固定的弓丝段移动8毫米的距离。对每个托槽/弓丝组合的摩擦阻力进行描述性统计分析,采用双向、平衡的方差分析来分析托槽类型和弓丝尺寸。Damon3托槽始终表现出最低的滑动摩擦阻力,而对于任何给定的弓丝,Speed托槽产生的摩擦阻力明显(P<0.001)高于其他测试托槽。自锁设计(被动与主动)似乎是自锁托槽在平移过程中产生摩擦阻力的主要变量。被动结扎托槽产生的摩擦阻力较小;然而,与主动结扎系统相比,这种摩擦力的降低可能会导致控制力下降。

相似文献

1
A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems.四种市售自锁托槽系统摩擦特性的研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):645-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn058. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
2
Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.传统结扎与自结扎金属托槽——一项对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Dec;30(6):654-60. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn053. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
3
Archwire depth is a significant parameter in the frictional resistance of active and interactive, but not passive, self-ligating brackets.弓丝深度是主动和交互而非被动自锁托槽的摩擦阻力的一个重要参数。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1036-44. doi: 10.2319/122810-751.1. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
4
Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics.滑动矫治力学过程中各种自锁托槽与弓丝组合之间的摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):463-467. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.029.
5
An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.不同尺寸弓丝与传统不锈钢及自锁不锈钢托槽在多种托槽-弓丝组合方式下摩擦特性的体外评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):660-664. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2102.
6
Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.不同结扎系统的自锁托槽和传统托槽的摩擦行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
Third-order torque and self-ligating orthodontic bracket-type effects on sliding friction.三阶扭矩和自锁正畸托槽类型对滑动摩擦的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2009 May;79(3):551-7. doi: 10.2319/022608-114.1.
8
A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.两种自锁托槽和两种用弹性结扎丝结扎的预成直丝弓托槽摩擦特性的体外对比研究。
Eur J Orthod. 1998 Oct;20(5):589-96. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.5.589.
9
A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.自锁式与传统正畸托槽系统的比较。
Br J Orthod. 1997 Nov;24(4):309-17. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.4.309.
10
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.颊侧段正畸托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦力
Angle Orthod. 1996;66(3):215-22. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0215:FRBOBA>2.3.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Pain Levels on Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment with 2 Different Self-Ligating Bracket Systems.两种不同自锁托槽系统用于固定正畸治疗的患者疼痛程度比较。
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Dec 29;36(4):239-247. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.128.
2
A Review on Orthodontic Brackets and Their Application in Clinical Orthodontics.正畸托槽及其在临床正畸中的应用综述
Cureus. 2023 Oct 7;15(10):e46615. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46615. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Friction and archwire engagement in contemporary self-ligating appliance systems : An in vitro comparison.
当代自锁托槽矫治系统中的摩擦力和弓丝锁结:体外对比研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Apr;84(Suppl 2):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00361-8. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Evaluation of the force generated by gradual deflection of 0.016-inch NiTi and stainless steel orthodontic wires in self-ligating metallic and esthetic brackets.对0.016英寸镍钛合金和不锈钢正畸弓丝在自锁金属托槽和美观托槽中逐渐弯曲时产生的力的评估。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 May 1;11(5):e464-e469. doi: 10.4317/jced.55698. eCollection 2019 May.
5
Resistance to sliding in orthodontics: misconception or method error? A systematic review and a proposal of a test protocol.正畸学中的滑动阻力:误解还是方法错误?一项系统评价及测试方案建议
Korean J Orthod. 2018 Jul;48(4):268-280. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.4.268. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
6
Force level of small diameter nickel-titanium orthodontic wires ligated with different methods.不同结扎方法对小直径镍钛正畸丝的结扎力影响。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0175-z. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
7
Evaluation of force released by deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional and self-ligating brackets.传统矫治器和自锁矫治器中正畸弓丝弯曲释放力的评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):91-97. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.091-097.oar.
8
Effect of passive self-ligating bracket placement on the posterior teeth on reduction of frictional force in sliding mechanics.后牙使用被动自锁托槽对滑动机制中摩擦力降低的影响。
Korean J Orthod. 2016 Mar;46(2):73-80. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.2.73. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
9
Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions.不同排齐条件下金属自锁托槽与传统交互式自锁托槽摩擦力的比较研究
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):82-9. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.082-089.oar.
10
Role of lubricants on friction between self-ligating brackets and archwires.润滑剂在自锁托槽与弓丝之间摩擦中的作用。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):1049-53. doi: 10.2319/110513-805.1. Epub 2014 Apr 1.