Rippe M P, Amaral R, Oliveira F S, Cesar P F, Scotti R, Valandro L F, Bottino M A
Oper Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):E1-E10. doi: 10.2341/13-310-L. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
This study evaluated the effect of the cement type (adhesive resin, self-adhesive, glass ionomer, and zinc phosphate) on the retention of crowns made of yttria-stabilized polycrystalline tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP). Therefore, 108 freshly extracted molars were embedded in acrylic resin, perpendicular to their long axis, and prepared for full crowns: the crown preparations were removed and reconstructed using composite resin plus fiber posts with dimensions identical to the prepared dentin. The preparations were impressed using addition silicone, and Y-TZP copings were produced, which presented a special setup for the tensile testing. Cementation was performed with two adhesive resin cements (Multilink Automix, Ivoclar-Vivadent; RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), one self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U100, 3M ESPE), one glass ionomer based cement (RelyX Luting, 3M ESPE), and one zinc phosphate cement (Cimento de Zinco, SS White, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). For the resin cement groups, the inner surfaces of the crowns were subjected to three surface treatments: cleaning with isopropyl alcohol, tribochemical silica coating, or application of a thin low-fusing glass porcelain layer plus silanization. After 24 hours, all groups were subjected to thermocycling (6000 cycles) and included in a special device for tensile testing in a universal testing machine to test the retention of the infrastructure. After testing, the failure modes of all samples were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the surface treatment and cement type (α=0.05) affected the tensile retention results. The Multilink cement presented the highest tensile retention values, but that result was not statistically different from RelyX ARC. The surface treatment was statistically relevant only for the Multilink cement. The cement choice was shown to be more important than the crown surface treatment for cementation of a Y-TZP crown to a composite resin substrate.
本研究评估了粘结剂类型(粘结性树脂、自粘结剂、玻璃离子体和磷酸锌)对氧化钇稳定的多晶四方氧化锆(Y-TZP)全冠固位力的影响。因此,将108颗新鲜拔除的磨牙垂直于其长轴嵌入丙烯酸树脂中,并制备全冠:去除牙冠预备体,使用尺寸与预备牙本质相同的复合树脂加纤维桩进行重建。使用加成型硅橡胶制取预备体印模,并制作Y-TZP内冠,其呈现出用于拉伸测试的特殊装置。使用两种粘结性树脂粘结剂(Multilink Automix,义获嘉-伟瓦登特公司;RelyX ARC,3M ESPE公司美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市)、一种自粘结性树脂粘结剂(RelyX U100,3M ESPE公司)、一种玻璃离子体基粘结剂(RelyX Luting,3M ESPE公司)和一种磷酸锌粘结剂(Cimento de Zinco,SS White公司巴西里约热内卢市)进行粘结。对于树脂粘结剂组,牙冠的内表面进行三种表面处理:用异丙醇清洁、摩擦化学硅涂层或涂覆一层薄的低熔点玻璃瓷层并进行硅烷化处理。24小时后,所有组均进行热循环(6000次循环),并置于万能试验机中用于拉伸测试的特殊装置中,以测试修复体的固位力。测试后,在体视显微镜下分析所有样本的失败模式。Kruskal-Wallis检验表明,表面处理和粘结剂类型(α=0.05)影响拉伸固位结果。Multilink粘结剂呈现出最高的拉伸固位值,但该结果与RelyX ARC在统计学上无差异。表面处理仅对Multilink粘结剂具有统计学意义。对于将Y-TZP全冠粘结到复合树脂基底上,粘结剂的选择比牙冠表面处理更为重要。