Suppr超能文献

interRAI长期护理机构(LTCF)和interRAI家庭护理(HC)的可靠性。

Reliability of the interRAI Long Term Care Facilities (LTCF) and interRAI Home Care (HC).

作者信息

Kim Hongsoo, Jung Young-Il, Sung Moonhee, Lee Ji-Yoon, Yoon Ju-Young, Yoon Jong-Lull

机构信息

Graduate School of Public Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Feb;15(2):220-8. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12330. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

Abstract

AIM

Sharing clinical information across care settings is a cornerstone to providing quality care to older people with complex conditions. The purpose of the present study was to examine the reliability of the interRAI Long Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF) and the interRAI Home Care (interRAI HC), comprehensive and integrated assessment instruments with common core items, in Korea, an Asian county where comprehensive geriatric assessment is not widely used in long-term care.

METHODS

The Korean version of the instruments was developed through field tests, as well as multiple iterations of translations, back-translations and expert reviews. For the reliability test, a random sample of 908 older people in 27 long-term care hospitals or nursing homes, or at home with home care, were assessed by regular staff, among which a subsample of 534 people were dually assessed. The Cronbach's alphas of seven major composite scales in the instruments were examined for internal consistency. Interrater reliability was tested using agreement, kappa coefficients and interclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The internal consistencies of all key measures were adequate (Cronbach's alpha≥0.75). The overall mean kappa statistics of the items in the interRAI LTCF and those in the interRAI HC were 0.78 and 0.89, respectively. All key common items in the interRAI LTCF and the interRAI HC had almost perfect (κ≥0.81) or substantial (0.61≤κ≤0.80) interrater reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings show the interRAI LTCF and the interRAI HC have adequate reliability for assessing the function and health of frail older adults across various long-term settings, which can promote continuity of care for the aged.

摘要

目的

跨医疗环境共享临床信息是为患有复杂病症的老年人提供优质护理的基石。本研究的目的是在韩国这个亚洲国家检验互认评估工具长期护理机构版(interRAI LTCF)和家庭护理版(interRAI HC)的可靠性,这两种工具是具有共同核心项目的综合且一体化的评估工具,而在韩国的长期护理中,全面老年评估并未广泛应用。

方法

通过现场测试以及多次翻译、回译和专家评审,开发了这些工具的韩文版。为进行可靠性测试,由正规工作人员对27家长期护理医院、养老院或接受家庭护理的家中的908名老年人进行随机抽样评估,其中534人进行了双重评估。检验了工具中七个主要综合量表的克朗巴哈系数以评估内部一致性。使用一致性、kappa系数和组内相关系数测试评分者间信度。

结果

所有关键指标的内部一致性良好(克朗巴哈系数≥0.75)。interRAI LTCF和interRAI HC中各项目的总体平均kappa统计量分别为0.78和0.89。interRAI LTCF和interRAI HC中的所有关键共同项目均具有几乎完美(κ≥0.81)或实质性(0.61≤κ≤0.80)的评分者间信度。

结论

研究结果表明,interRAI LTCF和interRAI HC在评估不同长期护理环境中体弱老年人的功能和健康状况方面具有足够的可靠性,这可以促进老年人护理的连续性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验