Suppr超能文献

过程与表征:作为涌现但又具成分性的认知控制

Processes versus representations: cognitive control as emergent, yet componential.

作者信息

Davelaar Eddy J

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;3(2):247-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01138.x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

Abstract

In this commentary, I focus on the difference between processes and representations and how this distinction relates to the question of what is controlled. Despite some views that task switching is a prototypical control process, the analysis concludes that task switching depends on the task goal representation and that control processes are there to prevent goal representations from disintegrating. Over time, these processes become obsolete, leaving behind a representation that automatically controls task performance. The distinction between processes and representations relates to practice effects and automaticity and sheds light on what is meant by the phrase "automatic control."

摘要

在这篇评论中,我关注的是过程与表征之间的差异,以及这种区分如何与“被控制的是什么”这一问题相关联。尽管有些观点认为任务切换是一种典型的控制过程,但分析得出的结论是,任务切换取决于任务目标表征,而控制过程的存在是为了防止目标表征瓦解。随着时间的推移,这些过程会过时,只留下一种自动控制任务执行的表征。过程与表征之间的区分与练习效应和自动性相关,并阐明了“自动控制”这一短语的含义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验