Suppr超能文献

锥形束计算机断层扫描中松质骨组织形态计量学测量及对比噪声比

Trabecular bone histomorphometric measurements and contrast-to-noise ratio in CBCT.

作者信息

Klintström E, Smedby O, Klintström B, Brismar T B, Moreno R

机构信息

1 Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(8):20140196. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140196. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate how imaging parameters at clinical dental CBCT affect the accuracy in quantifying trabecular bone structures, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and radiation dose.

METHODS

15 radius samples were examined using CBCT (Accuitomo FPD; J. Morita Mfg., Kyoto, Japan). Nine imaging protocols were used, differing in current, voltage, rotation degree, voxel size, imaging area and rotation time. Radiation doses were measured using a kerma area product-meter. After segmentation, six bone structure parameters and CNRs were quantified. Micro-CT (μCT) images with an isotropic resolution of 20 μm were used as a gold standard.

RESULTS

Structure parameters obtained by CBCT were strongly correlated to those by μCT, with correlation coefficients >0.90 for all studied parameters. Bone volume and trabecular thickness were not affected by changes in imaging parameters. Increased tube current from 5 to 8 mA, decreased isotropic voxel size from 125 to 80 μm and decreased rotation angle from 360° to 180° affected correlations for trabecular termini negatively. Decreasing rotation degree also weakened correlations for trabecular separation and trabecular number at 80 μm voxel size. Changes in the rotation degree and tube current affected CNR significantly. The radiation dose varied between 269 and 1153 mGy cm(2).

CONCLUSIONS

Trabecular bone structure can be accurately quantified by clinical dental CBCT in vitro, and the obtained structure parameters are strongly related to those obtained by μCT. A fair CNR and strong correlations can be obtained with a low radiation dose, indicating the possibility for monitoring trabecular bone structure also in vivo.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估临床牙科锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的成像参数如何影响小梁骨结构定量、对比噪声比(CNR)和辐射剂量的准确性。

方法

使用CBCT(Accuitomo FPD;日本京都森田制造公司)对15个桡骨样本进行检查。采用了9种成像方案,电流、电压、旋转角度、体素大小、成像区域和旋转时间各不相同。使用比释动能面积乘积仪测量辐射剂量。分割后,对六个骨结构参数和CNR进行定量。以各向同性分辨率为20μm的显微计算机断层扫描(μCT)图像作为金标准。

结果

CBCT获得的结构参数与μCT获得的参数高度相关,所有研究参数的相关系数均>0.90。骨体积和小梁厚度不受成像参数变化的影响。管电流从5 mA增加到8 mA、各向同性体素大小从125μm减小到80μm以及旋转角度从360°减小到180°对小梁末端的相关性有负面影响。旋转角度减小也会削弱80μm体素大小下小梁间距和小梁数量的相关性。旋转角度和管电流的变化对CNR有显著影响。辐射剂量在269至1153 mGy·cm²之间变化。

结论

临床牙科CBCT能够在体外准确量化小梁骨结构,获得的结构参数与μCT获得的参数密切相关。在低辐射剂量下可获得良好的CNR和强相关性,表明在体内监测小梁骨结构也是可行的。

相似文献

1
Trabecular bone histomorphometric measurements and contrast-to-noise ratio in CBCT.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(8):20140196. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140196. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
2
3
A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(8):20130145. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130145. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
5
Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(8):20150078. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150078. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
7
Quantitative Evaluation of Bone Microstructure using High-Resolution Extremity Cone-Beam CT with a CMOS Detector.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2019 Feb;10953. doi: 10.1117/12.2515504. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
9
Application of a Novel Ultra-High Resolution Multi-Detector CT in Quantitative Imaging of Trabecular Microstructure.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Feb;11317. doi: 10.1117/12.2552385. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

3
The influence of the field of view and voxel size on the contrast-to-noise ratio in cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2024 Dec;54(4):362-369. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240096. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
4
Automated bone property analysis using corrected in vivo dental cone-beam CT data of human wrists.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 16;14(1):30466. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75222-6.
5
Gray values and noise behavior of cone-beam computed tomography machines-an in vitro study.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2025 Feb 1;54(2):140-148. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twae053.
9
Trabecular bone microstructure analysis on data from a novel twin robotic X-ray device.
Acta Radiol. 2023 Apr;64(4):1566-1572. doi: 10.1177/02841851221134973. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
10
Micro-computed tomography assessment of bone structure in aging mice.
Sci Rep. 2022 May 17;12(1):8117. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11965-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Trabecular bone structure parameters from 3D image processing of clinical multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography data.
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Feb;43(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s00256-013-1766-5. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
3
The effect of scan parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructural measurements of the human mandible.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(10):20130206. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130206. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
4
The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: a comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT.
J Biomech. 2013 Oct 18;46(15):2611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
5
A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(8):20130145. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130145. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
6
Accuracy of trabecular bone microstructural measurement at planned dental implant sites using cone-beam CT datasets.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):941-5. doi: 10.1111/clr.12163. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
8
Mandibular bone changes in 24 years and skeletal fracture prediction.
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0745-x. Epub 2012 May 1.
9
The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24(8):871-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02390.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验