Sciaraffia Elena, Chen Jian, Hocini Meleze, Larsen Torben Bierregaard, Potpara Tatjana, Blomström-Lundqvist Carina
Department of Cardiology, Institution of Medical Science, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.
Europace. 2014 Sep;16(9):1384-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu222.
Several kinds of electrocardiogram monitoring systems are now available in the clinical practice. The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the use of different monitoring techniques in the evaluation of patients with unexplained syncope, palpitations, and in those with established diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. Forty-five centres in Europe answered the questionnaire and the majority (78%) were university hospitals. The answers showed a discrepancy between the recommended use of implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in patients with unexplained syncope and the use of this device in clinical practice. In most of the cases only a minority of patients (<20%) seemed to actually receive an ILR as a part of the diagnostic process in accordance to the current guidelines. Holter monitoring systems and external loop recorders seemed to be the preferred monitoring techniques both in patients with recurrent palpitations and in those with established diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
目前临床实践中有几种心电图监测系统可供使用。欧洲心律协会(EHRA)这项调查的目的是评估不同监测技术在不明原因晕厥、心悸患者以及已确诊房颤患者评估中的应用情况。欧洲45个中心回答了问卷,其中大多数(78%)是大学医院。答案显示,在不明原因晕厥患者中推荐使用植入式环路记录仪(ILR)与该设备在临床实践中的使用情况之间存在差异。在大多数情况下,按照现行指南,似乎只有少数患者(<20%)在诊断过程中实际接受了ILR。动态心电图监测系统和体外环路记录仪似乎是心悸复发患者和已确诊房颤患者首选的监测技术。