Payne M, Roscoe D
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;34(2):303-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2235-3. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
Chromogenic media (CM) are available for urine specimens (US) to enable rapid identification of common urinary tract pathogens (UTP). Two CM, chromID™ CPS (CPS4) agar (bioMérieux, St. Laurent, QC) and UriSelect™ 4 (URS4) agar (Bio-Rad, Montreal, QC), were compared to the standard media (SM) for the isolation and identification of UTP. Over a 10-day period, US were inoculated to CPS4, URS4, and SM (BAP and MAC). CM interpretation was done according to the product inserts by one person blinded to the results of SM. SM were read by experienced technologists according to protocol and isolates were identified using BD Phoenix™. The results were grouped into significant (SG), mixed (MG), and no significant growth (NSG). A total of 903 US were studied. SM identified 239 SG, 112 MG, and 552 NSG cultures. The most common pathogens were Escherichia coli (38 %) and Enterococcus spp. (11 %). Comparing CM to SM, the exact agreement was 89.3 and 89.5 % for URS4 and CPS4, respectively. When grouped by clinical significance, agreement with SM was 93.0 and 93.1 % for URS4 and CPS4, respectively. CM were equivalent with respect to processing time. Advantages include decreased need for automated identification of certain species, particularly E. coli. In terms of workflow, CM enables same-day identification for almost 50 % of significant UTP. Overall, both CM compared well to SM and allowed for rapid preliminary identification of many UTP.
显色培养基(CM)可用于尿液标本(US),以快速鉴定常见的尿路病原体(UTP)。将两种显色培养基chromID™ CPS(CPS4)琼脂(生物梅里埃公司,魁北克省圣洛朗)和UriSelect™ 4(URS4)琼脂(伯乐公司,魁北克省蒙特利尔)与标准培养基(SM)进行比较,用于分离和鉴定UTP。在10天的时间里,将尿液标本接种到CPS4、URS4和SM(血平板和麦康凯平板)上。由一名对标准培养基结果不知情的人员根据产品说明书对显色培养基进行判读。标准培养基由经验丰富的技术人员按照规程进行判读,并使用BD Phoenix™鉴定分离株。结果分为有意义生长(SG)、混合生长(MG)和无显著生长(NSG)。共研究了903份尿液标本。标准培养基鉴定出239份有意义生长、112份混合生长和552份无显著生长的培养物。最常见的病原体是大肠埃希菌(38%)和肠球菌属(11%)。将显色培养基与标准培养基进行比较,URS4和CPS4与标准培养基的完全一致性分别为89.3%和89.5%。按临床意义分组时,URS4和CPS4与标准培养基的一致性分别为93.0%和93.1%。显色培养基在处理时间方面相当。优点包括减少了对某些菌种(特别是大肠埃希菌)进行自动化鉴定的需求。在工作流程方面,显色培养基能够对近50%的有意义UTP进行当天鉴定。总体而言,两种显色培养基与标准培养基相比效果良好,并能对许多UTP进行快速初步鉴定。