Suppr超能文献

牙医在基于牙科实践的研究网络中进行龋齿风险评估的决策。

Dentists' decisions to conduct caries risk assessment in a Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

作者信息

Kakudate Naoki, Sumida Futoshi, Matsumoto Yuki, Yokoyama Yoko, Riley Joseph L, Gilbert Gregg H, Gordan Valeria V

机构信息

Educational Cooperation Center, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;43(2):128-34. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12127. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(i) To quantify the importance that dentists place on caries risk factors when developing a caries treatment plan and (ii) to test the hypothesis that the ratings of importance for specific factors are significantly associated with whether or not the dentist performs caries risk assessment (CRA).

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional study design consisting of a questionnaire survey. The study queried dentists who worked in outpatient dental practices who were affiliated with the Dental Practice-Based Research Network Japan (JDPBRN), which seeks to engage dentists in investigating research questions and sharing experiences and expertise (n = 282). Participants (n = 189) were asked to rate the importance of caries risk factors when developing a caries treatment plan in both adult and pediatric patients.

RESULTS

Oral hygiene status was rated as the most important risk factor when developing a treatment plan in both adult and pediatric patients, whereas the use of fluorides was rated as the least important. Results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratios for the decision to perform CRA in the adult patient for past caries experience and use of fluorides were 2.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-5.29) and 1.85 (95% CI: 1.12-3.04), respectively, whereas that for oral hygiene was 3.84 (95% CI: 1.15-12.79) and use of fluorides 1.79 (95% CI: 1.06-3.03) in the pediatric patient.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that enhancing dentists' concept of the importance of current use of fluorides when developing a treatment plan may increase the percentage of dentists who conduct CRA in both adult and pediatric patients (clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01680848).

摘要

目的

(i)量化牙医在制定龋齿治疗计划时对龋齿风险因素的重视程度;(ii)检验关于特定因素重要性评级与牙医是否进行龋齿风险评估(CRA)显著相关的假设。

方法

本研究采用横断面研究设计,包括问卷调查。该研究对在日本基于牙科实践的研究网络(JDPBRN)附属的门诊牙科诊所工作的牙医进行了调查,该网络旨在让牙医参与研究问题调查并分享经验和专业知识(n = 282)。参与者(n = 189)被要求对在为成人和儿童患者制定龋齿治疗计划时龋齿风险因素的重要性进行评级。

结果

在为成人和儿童患者制定治疗计划时,口腔卫生状况被评为最重要的风险因素,而氟化物的使用被评为最不重要。多元逻辑回归分析结果显示,在成人患者中,因过去的龋齿经历和氟化物使用而决定进行CRA的优势比分别为2.61(95%置信区间[CI]:1.29 - 5.29)和1.85(95%CI:1.12 - 3.04),而在儿童患者中,口腔卫生的优势比为3.84(95%CI:1.15 - 12.79),氟化物使用的优势比为1.79(95%CI:1.06 - 3.03)。

结论

这些结果表明,在制定治疗计划时增强牙医对当前使用氟化物重要性的认识,可能会提高在成人和儿童患者中进行CRA的牙医比例(clinicaltrials.gov注册号:NCT01680848)。

相似文献

1
Dentists' decisions to conduct caries risk assessment in a Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;43(2):128-34. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12127. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
2
Evidence-practice gap for in-office fluoride application in a dental practice-based research network.
J Public Health Dent. 2016 Mar;76(2):91-7. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12114. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
3
Patient age and dentists' decisions about occlusal caries treatment thresholds.
Oper Dent. 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):473-80. doi: 10.2341/13-141-C. Epub 2014 May 8.
4
Dentists' dietary perception and practice patterns in a dental practice-based research network.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059615. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
6
7
Dentists' use of caries risk assessment and individualized caries prevention for their adult patients: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;39(6):564-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00626.x. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
10
Preferences for caries prevention agents in adult patients: findings from the dental practice-based research network.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;38(4):360-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00547.x. Epub 2010 May 18.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluation of caries risk assessment practices among dental practitioners in Guangzhou, China: a cross-sectional study.
Front Oral Health. 2024 Oct 16;5:1458188. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1458188. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of factors associated with the evidence-practice gap as perceived by Japanese and Brazilian dentists.
J Dent. 2024 Oct;149:105255. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105255. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
5
Associations of health literacy with dental care use and oral health status in Japan.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15866-7.
7
Caries risk assessment-related knowledge, attitude, and behaviors among Chinese dentists: a cross-sectional survey.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Mar;27(3):1079-1087. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04694-5. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
9
Caries risk assessment in dental practices by dentists from a Brazilian community.
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Nov 23;35:e017. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0017. eCollection 2020.
10
Evidence-practice gap in minimal intervention dentistry: Findings from a dental practice-based research network.
J Dent. 2020 Nov;102:103469. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103469. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

2
Restorative treatment thresholds for proximal caries in dental PBRN.
J Dent Res. 2012 Dec;91(12):1202-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034512464778. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
3
Evidence on existing caries risk assessment systems: are they predictive of future caries?
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):67-78. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12003.
4
Translating research into everyday clinical practice: lessons learned from a USA dental practice-based research network.
Dent Mater. 2013 Jan;29(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.159. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
5
6
Dentists' use of caries risk assessment and individualized caries prevention for their adult patients: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;39(6):564-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00626.x. Epub 2011 Jul 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验