Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Kyushu Dental University, 2-6-1, Manazuru, Kokura-kita, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 803-8580, Japan; University of Florida College of Dentistry, P.O. Box 100415, Gainesville, FL 32610-0415, USA.
Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, 5322 Endo Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-0882, Japan.
J Dent. 2021 Dec;115:103854. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103854. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
To determine whether: the evidence-practice gap (EPG) in minimal intervention dentistry (MID) can be improved by a tailored web-based intervention, and specific clinical situations might impede implementing MID.
We conducted a before-after intervention study and a qualitative study. Two web-based questionnaire surveys were conducted among 197 Japanese dentists. In the first questionnaire, a baseline EPG was measured using six questionnaire items. Subsequently, feedback material about the EPG was electronically prepared, including results of the first questionnaire, international comparisons with a previous study from the US, and a summary of recent evidence on MID. In the second questionnaire, the EPG was re-measured after participants read the material. The primary outcome was mean overall concordance between published evidence and the dentist's clinical practice for all six questions. During the second questionnaire, we performed qualitative content analysis using free-text responses to a question about difficult situations encountered when conducting MID.
Regarding before and after comparisons of concordance between the first and second questionnaires, mean overall concordance improved significantly, from 66% to 89% (p<0.001). Qualitative content analysis identified five difficult situations: "cases where decision making for treatment and prognosis is difficult", "inadequate practice resources", "limitations on patient visit and treatment period", "discrepancy between MID and the patient's values", and "limitations on health insurance and social understanding".
These results suggest that it is possible to reduce the EPG in MID using a web-based educational intervention among Japanese dentists. Qualitative content analysis revealed five difficult situations that might hinder implementation of MID.
Although this intervention demonstrated educational effects, perfect concordance was not achieved by all participants. This is possibly associated with the five situations that participants reported facing when conducting MID. Creating an environment to improve these situations may facilitate a reduction in the EPG.
确定通过定制的基于网络的干预措施是否可以缩小最小干预牙科(MID)中的证据-实践差距(EPG),以及特定临床情况是否会阻碍 MID 的实施。
我们进行了一项干预前后研究和一项定性研究。对 197 名日本牙医进行了两次基于网络的问卷调查。在第一份问卷中,使用六个问卷项目测量了基线 EPG。随后,电子生成了关于 EPG 的反馈材料,包括第一份问卷的结果、与美国之前研究的国际比较,以及关于 MID 的最新证据总结。在第二份问卷中,参与者阅读材料后重新测量了 EPG。主要结果是所有六个问题中发表的证据与牙医临床实践之间的总体一致性的平均。在第二份问卷中,我们对一个关于在进行 MID 时遇到的困难情况的问题的自由文本回复进行了定性内容分析。
关于第一份和第二份问卷之间一致性的前后比较,总体一致性显著提高,从 66%提高到 89%(p<0.001)。定性内容分析确定了五个困难情况:“治疗和预后决策困难的病例”、“实践资源不足”、“患者就诊和治疗期有限”、“MID 与患者价值观之间的差异”和“健康保险和社会理解的限制”。
这些结果表明,通过日本牙医的基于网络的教育干预,缩小 MID 中的 EPG 是可能的。定性内容分析揭示了可能阻碍 MID 实施的五个困难情况。
虽然这种干预措施表现出了教育效果,但并非所有参与者都达到了完全一致。这可能与参与者在进行 MID 时报告的五个情况有关。创造一个改善这些情况的环境可能有助于缩小 EPG。