Pezawas Thomas, Grimm Michael, Ristl Robin, Kivaranovic Danijel, Moser Fabian T, Laufer Guenther, Schmidinger Herwig
Department of Internal Medicine II, Devision of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Transpl Int. 2015 Jan;28(1):34-41. doi: 10.1111/tri.12436.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether short-term primary preventive cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation as bridge to heart transplantation (HTX) provides any survival benefit. Thirty-three patients awaiting HTX were randomized to either conventional therapy (control group) or primary preventive ICD implantation (ICD group). Fourteen patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and 19 patients had dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Sixteen patients were randomized to the ICD group and 17 patients were randomized to the control group. Twenty patients (61%) were transplanted after a waiting time of 10 ± 9 months. The remaining 13 patients (39%) were not transplanted because of clinical improvement (n = 5), cerebral hemorrhage (n = 3), or death (n = 5). On the waiting list, 3 ICD patients with DCM developed slow VTs without ICD intervention, two patients with ICM (6%) had fast VT terminated by the ICD, and no arrhythmic death was observed. After 11.9 years (median), 13 of 20 HTX patients (65%) and 5 of 13 non-HTX patients (38%) were alive. Survivors had a higher LVEF (22 ± 6 vs. 17 ± 4%, P = 0.0092) and a better exercise capacity (75 ± 29 vs. 57 ± 24 Watt, P = 0.0566) at baseline as compared to nonsurvivors. This study may not support the general use of primary preventive ICDs as a short-term bridge to heart transplantation.
本研究旨在评估作为心脏移植(HTX)桥梁的短期一级预防性植入心脏复律除颤器(ICD)是否能带来生存获益。33例等待HTX的患者被随机分为传统治疗组(对照组)或一级预防性ICD植入组(ICD组)。14例患者患有缺血性心肌病(ICM),19例患者患有扩张型心肌病(DCM)。16例患者被随机分入ICD组,17例患者被随机分入对照组。20例患者(61%)在等待10±9个月后接受了移植。其余13例患者(39%)未接受移植,原因包括临床改善(n = 5)、脑出血(n = 3)或死亡(n = 5)。在等待名单上,3例DCM的ICD患者在未接受ICD干预的情况下发生了缓慢室性心动过速(VT),2例ICM患者(6%)的快速VT被ICD终止,未观察到心律失常死亡。11.9年(中位数)后,20例HTX患者中有13例(65%)存活,13例未接受HTX的患者中有5例(38%)存活。与未存活者相比,存活者在基线时左心室射血分数(LVEF)更高(22±6 vs. 17±4%,P = 0.0092),运动能力更好(75±29 vs. 57±24瓦特,P = 0.0566)。本研究可能不支持将一级预防性ICD普遍用作心脏移植的短期桥梁。