Suppr超能文献

六周非周期性和周期性力量训练方案对业余男性的早期适应。

Early adaptations to six weeks of non-periodized and periodized strength training regimens in recreational males.

机构信息

Laboratory of Adaptations to Strength Training, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo , SP, Brazil ; Department of Physical Education, Paulista University (UNIP), Sao Paulo , SP, Brazil.

Laboratory of Adaptations to Strength Training, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo , SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Sports Sci Med. 2014 Sep 1;13(3):604-9. eCollection 2014 Sep.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study compared quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and maximum strength (1RM) after three different short-term strength training (ST) regimens (i.e. non-periodized [NP], traditional-periodization [TP], and undulating-periodization [UP]) matched for volume load in previously untrained individuals. Thirty-one recreationally active males were randomly divided into four groups: NP: n = 9; TP: n = 9; UP: n = 8 and control group (C): n = 5. Experimental groups underwent a 6-week program consisting of two training sessions per week. Muscle strength was assessed at baseline and after the training period. Dominant leg quadriceps CSA was obtained through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 48h after the last training session.

RESULTS

The 1RM increased from pre to post only in the NP and UP groups (NP = 17.0 %, p = 0.002; UP = 12.9 %, p = 0.03), respectively. There were no significant differences in 1RM for LP and C groups after 6 weeks (TP = 7.7 %, p = 0.58, C = 1.2 %, p = 1.00). The CSA increased from pre to post in all of the experimental groups (NP = 5.1 %, p = 0.0001; TP = 4.6 %, p = 0.001; UP = 5.2 %, p = 0.0001), with no changes observed in the C group (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that different ST periodization regimens over a short-term (i.e. 6 weeks), volume load equated conditions seem to induce similar hypertrophic responses regardless of the loading scheme employed. In addition, for those recreational males who need to develop muscle strength in the short-term, the training regimen should be designed properly. Key pointsMuscle hypertrophy occurs within six weeks in recreationally active men regardless the ST training regimen employed.When the total volume is similar, training at greater intensities will demonstrate superior gains in the 1RM performance.Some caution should be exercised when interpreting our findings since long-term periodized regimens could produce different training-induced responses.

摘要

本研究比较了三种不同短期力量训练(ST)方案(即无周期性[NP]、传统周期性[TP]和波动周期性[UP])后未经训练个体的股四头肌横截面积(CSA)和最大力量(1RM)。31 名有规律运动的男性被随机分为四组:NP 组:n = 9;TP 组:n = 9;UP 组:n = 8 和对照组(C):n = 5。实验组进行了为期 6 周的训练计划,每周两次训练。在基线和训练期后评估肌肉力量。通过磁共振成像(MRI)在基线和最后一次训练后 48 小时获得优势腿股四头肌 CSA。

结果

仅 NP 和 UP 组的 1RM 从基线到训练后增加(NP = 17.0%,p = 0.002;UP = 12.9%,p = 0.03)。6 周后,LP 和 C 组的 1RM 没有显著差异(TP = 7.7%,p = 0.58,C = 1.2%,p = 1.00)。所有实验组的 CSA 均从基线到训练后增加(NP = 5.1%,p = 0.0001;TP = 4.6%,p = 0.001;UP = 5.2%,p = 0.0001),C 组无变化(p = 0.93)。

结论

我们的结果表明,在短期(即 6 周)、等容负荷条件下,不同的 ST 周期化方案似乎会引起相似的肥大反应,而与所采用的负荷方案无关。此外,对于那些需要在短期内发展肌肉力量的业余男性,训练方案应进行适当设计。关键点在进行短期力量训练时,无论所采用的 ST 训练方案如何,业余男性的肌肉都会在六周内发生肥大。当总容量相同时,更高强度的训练会导致 1RM 表现的更大增益。在解释我们的发现时应谨慎,因为长期周期性方案可能会产生不同的训练诱导反应。

相似文献

4
Periodization effects during short-term resistance training with equated exercise variables in females.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Mar;117(3):441-454. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3544-x. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
5
Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.
Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1373-86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0355-2.
7
Periodized Resistance Training for Enhancing Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength: A Mini-Review.
Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 23;10:13. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00013. eCollection 2019.
8
Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis.
Sports Med. 2017 Oct;47(10):2083-2100. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0734-y.
9
Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jul;25(7):1824-30. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e7ff75.
10
Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Jul;18(6):772-780. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1450898. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of two training modalities on sprint performance in young American football players.
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Apr 7;7:1554055. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1554055. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of Six-week Periodized Versus Non-Periodized Kettlebell Swing Training on Strength, Power and Muscular Endurance.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Mar 1;15(4):526-540. doi: 10.70252/PAQB8351. eCollection 2022.
5
The effects of resistance training on muscular strength and hypertrophy in elderly cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Sport Health Sci. 2022 Mar;11(2):194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
6
Periodization: Variation in the Definition and Discrepancies in Study Design.
Sports Med. 2021 Apr;51(4):625-651. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01414-5. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis.
Sports Med. 2017 Oct;47(10):2083-2100. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0734-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Resistance Training: Basic Principles (Part 1 of 4).
Phys Sportsmed. 1988 Mar;16(3):160-71. doi: 10.1080/00913847.1988.11709461.
2
Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Jul;113(1):71-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
3
Comparison between nonlinear and linear periodized resistance training: hypertrophic and strength effects.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 May;26(5):1389-95. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318231a659.
5
Enhancing muscular qualities in untrained women: linear versus undulating periodization.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Sep;41(9):1797-807. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a154f3.
6
Nonlinear periodization maximizes strength gains in split resistance training routines.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jul;23(4):1321-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00f96.
7
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Mar;41(3):687-708. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670.
8
Comparison of linear and reverse linear periodization effects on maximal strength and body composition.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jan;23(1):266-74. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874bf3.
9
A comparison of periodization models during nine weeks with equated volume and intensity for strength.
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1245-50. doi: 10.1519/R-20446.1.
10
Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jan;102(1):368-73. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2006. Epub 2006 Oct 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验