Suppr超能文献

不同强度抗阻训练结合等容量负荷对肌肉力量和肥大的影响。

Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy.

机构信息

a Department of Health Sciences , University Ibirapuera , São Paulo , Brazil.

b Department of Sport, School of Physical Education and Sport , University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Jul;18(6):772-780. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1450898. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of different intensities of resistance training (RT) on elbow flexion and leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Thirty men volunteered to participate in an RT programme, performed twice a week for 12 weeks. The study employed a within-subject design, in which one leg and arm trained at 20% 1RM (G20) and the contralateral limb was randomly assigned to one of the three conditions: 40% (G40); 60% (G60), and 80% 1RM (G80). The G20 started RT session with three sets to failure. After G20 training, the number of sets was adjusted for the other contralateral limb conditions with volume-matched. CSA and 1RM were assessed at pre, post-6 weeks, and post-12 weeks. There was time effect for CSA for the vastus lateralis (VL) (8.9%, 20.5%, 20.4%, and 19.5%) and elbow flexors (EF) (11.4%, 25.3%, 25.1%, and 25%) in G20, G40, G60, and G80, respectively (p > .05). G80 showed higher CSA than G20 for VL (19.5% vs. 8.9%) and EF (25% vs. 11.4%) at post-12 weeks (p < .05). There was time effect for elbow flexion and unilateral leg press strength for all groups post-12 weeks (p < .05). However, the magnitude of increase was higher in G60 and G80. In conclusion, when low to high intensities of RT are performed with volume-matched, all intensities were effective for increasing muscle strength and size; however, 20% 1RM was suboptimal in this regard, and only the heavier RT intensity (80% 1RM) was shown superior for increasing strength and CSA compared to low intensities.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨不同强度的抗阻训练(RT)对肘关节屈伸和腿举 1 次最大重复次数(1RM)及肌肉横截面积(CSA)的影响。30 名男性志愿者参加了一项 RT 方案,每周进行两次,持续 12 周。该研究采用了自身对照设计,其中一条腿和一只手臂以 20% 1RM(G20)进行训练,对侧肢体随机分配到以下三种条件之一:40%(G40);60%(G60)和 80% 1RM(G80)。G20 以三组力竭开始 RT 训练。在 G20 训练后,根据其他对侧肢体的条件调整训练组数,以保持训练量相同。在训练前、第 6 周后和第 12 周后评估 CSA 和 1RM。CSA 存在时间效应,对于股外侧肌(VL)(8.9%、20.5%、20.4%和 19.5%)和屈肘肌(EF)(11.4%、25.3%、25.1%和 25%),G20、G40、G60 和 G80 分别显示(p>.05)。G80 在第 12 周时的 CSA 高于 G20,VL(19.5%比 8.9%)和 EF(25%比 11.4%)(p<.05)。所有组在第 12 周后肘关节屈伸和单侧腿举力量均存在时间效应(p<.05)。然而,G60 和 G80 的增加幅度更大。总之,当以匹配的训练量进行低到高的 RT 强度时,所有强度都能有效增加肌肉力量和大小;然而,20% 1RM 在这方面效果不佳,只有更高的 RT 强度(80% 1RM)在增加力量和 CSA 方面优于低强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验