Zhe Zheng, Kun Hua, Xuezeng Xu, Yunge Chen, Zengshan Ma, Huiming Guo, Liming Liu, Liang Tiao, Zhiwei Wang, Hansong Sun, Shengshou Hu
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijin, 100037, People's Republic of China.
Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Heart Surg Forum. 2014 Aug;17(4):E227-31. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.2014382.
The purpose of this study is to compare early clinical outcomes of surgical repair for isolated atrial septal defect (ASD) with a totally thoracoscopic approach without robotic assistance versus a conventional open procedure.Between September 2010 and June 2012, 254 consecutive patients with isolated ASD underwent totally thoracoscopic surgery without robotic assistance in seven institutions participating in the nationwide multi-centered registry in China. During the same period, these patients were matched using propensity score methodology with 254 patients who had accepted conventional open surgery through a median sternotomy. The early in-hospital results between the two groups were analyzed and compared.The patient age was 26.8 ± 14.0 years and weight was 52.9 ± 16.9 kg in the totally thoracoscopic group. The totally thoracoscopic surgery required longer aortic clamp time (32.1 ± 17.3 minutes versus 28.3 ± 16.7 minutes, P = .01); shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (25.3 ± 12.2 hours versus 34.8 ± 24.4 hours, P = .001); shorter length of stay in hospital (6.5 ± 6.3 days versus 7.9 ± 6.4 days, P = .008); and shorter mechanical ventilation time (8.3 ± 5.0 hours versus 11.4 ± 14.8 hours, P = .04). The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (62.7 ± 29.3 minutes versus 61.5 ± 28.0 minutes, P = .64) showed no significant difference between the two groups. The totally thoracoscopic group had significantly less postoperative chest tube drainage (322.1 ± 213.7 mL versus 462.8 ± 398.4 mL, P = .001). The intraoperative (35.4% versus 38.6%, P = .46) and postoperative blood products usage (20.9% versus 21.3%, P = .91) showed no significant difference between the two groups.There also was no significant difference in mortality and major in-hospital complications between the two groups. The early outcomes for treatment of isolated ASD were similar between the totally thoracoscopic group conventional open operation performed through median sternotomy, despite a longer aortic clamp time in the totally thoracoscopic group.
本研究旨在比较完全胸腔镜下无机器人辅助修补孤立性房间隔缺损(ASD)与传统开胸手术的早期临床结果。2010年9月至2012年6月期间,254例连续的孤立性ASD患者在参与中国全国多中心注册研究的7家机构接受了完全胸腔镜下无机器人辅助手术。同期,采用倾向评分法将这些患者与254例接受传统正中开胸手术的患者进行匹配。分析并比较两组患者的早期院内结果。完全胸腔镜组患者年龄为26.8±14.0岁,体重为52.9±16.9kg。完全胸腔镜手术需要更长的主动脉阻断时间(32.1±17.3分钟对28.3±16.7分钟,P = 0.01);重症监护病房住院时间更短(25.3±12.2小时对34.8±24.4小时,P = 0.001);住院时间更短(6.5±6.3天对7.9±6.4天,P = 0.008);机械通气时间更短(8.3±5.0小时对11.4±14.8小时,P = 0.04)。两组间体外循环(CPB)时间(62.7±29.3分钟对61.5±28.0分钟,P = 0.64)无显著差异。完全胸腔镜组术后胸腔闭式引流量显著减少(322.1±213.7ml对462.8±398.4ml,P = 0.001)。两组术中(35.4%对38.6%,P = 0.46)和术后血制品使用情况(20.9%对21.3%,P = 0.91)无显著差异。两组间死亡率和主要院内并发症也无显著差异。尽管完全胸腔镜组主动脉阻断时间较长,但完全胸腔镜组与经正中开胸的传统开胸手术治疗孤立性ASD的早期结果相似。