Liu Yanyi, Liu Zhuang, Li Xin, Li Ning, Kong Ruirui, Jiang Yiyao, Ge Shenglin, Zhang Chengxin
Department of Cardiac Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui, China.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233000, Anhui, China.
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Sep 23;2022:5371493. doi: 10.1155/2022/5371493. eCollection 2022.
Robotic surgery can provide less surgical trauma than conventional surgery, but differences between robotic and thoracoscopic surgery for atrial septal defect (ASD) repair are not well documented. To explore whether ASD can be repaired by thoracoscopic surgery or robotic surgery, which procedure is less invasive, and the difference in outcomes between these two procedures, this article studies 160 patients undergoing ASD repair at our institution. Sixty-five patients underwent total thoracoscopic surgery and 95 patients underwent total endoscopic robotic surgery. Propensity score matching yielded 64 well-matched patient pairs. Surgical data and early postoperative outcomes between the two matched groups were analyzed and compared. The results show that thoracoscopic and robotic surgery to repair ASD are both safe and reliable, and the early curative effect is good. However, regardless of similar complication rates, robotic surgery has a shorter time, less postoperative drainage, and faster recovery than thoracoscopic surgery.
机器人手术相比传统手术可提供更少的手术创伤,但机器人手术与胸腔镜手术在房间隔缺损(ASD)修复方面的差异尚无充分记录。为探究ASD能否通过胸腔镜手术或机器人手术修复、哪种手术侵入性更小以及这两种手术在结果上的差异,本文对我院160例行ASD修复术的患者进行了研究。65例患者接受了全胸腔镜手术,95例患者接受了全内镜机器人手术。倾向评分匹配产生了64对匹配良好的患者对。对两组匹配患者的手术数据和术后早期结果进行了分析和比较。结果表明,胸腔镜手术和机器人手术修复ASD均安全可靠,早期疗效良好。然而,尽管并发症发生率相似,但机器人手术比胸腔镜手术时间更短、术后引流更少且恢复更快。