Xiao Cangsong, Gao Changqing, Yang Ming, Wang Gang, Wu Yang, Wang Jiali, Wang Rong, Yao Minghui
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;19(6):933-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu263. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Robotic technology has been applied to atrial septal defect (ASD) repair for more than 10 years, but the number of cases reported is limited and results of long-term follow-up are not clear. This study reports on a large group of patients who underwent totally robotic ASD repair on an arrested or beating heart at a single institution with a 7-year follow-up.
From 2007 to 2013, 160 patients (median age, 36 years; range, 11-66 years) at our centre underwent selective repair of secundum-type ASD using the da Vinci robotic system. The first 54 cases were performed on an arrested heart (arrested-heart group, n = 54) and the remainder on a beating heart (beating-heart group, n = 106). The mean diameter of defects was 2.9 cm (range, 1.1-4.1 cm). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved via cannulation of the femoral vessels and the right internal jugular vein. Blood cardioplegic arrest was induced using a transthoracic Chitwood clamp in the arrested-heart group. With the assistance of a robotic surgical system, atrial septal defect repairs were performed with or without tricuspid valvuloplasty via three 8-mm ports, a camera port and a working port in the right chest. Transoesophageal echocardiography was used to evaluate surgical results and follow-up.
Complete ASD closure was verified by intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography in all patients. None of the procedures was converted to an alternate technique and there were no major complications. There were significant learning curves for cross-clamp time, operative duration and cardiopulmonary bypass time. The beating-heart group had significantly shorter operative and cardiopulmonary bypass durations than the arrested-heart group (P = 0.000). The two groups had similar durations of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit and hospital stays, and similar drainage volumes. During the 39 ± 21 months of follow-up, no patient required reoperation because of a residual shunt or tricuspid valve regurgitation.
ASD can be performed safely and effectively on an arrested or beating heart with the assistance of robotic technology. This totally endoscopic approach represents an option for patients seeking a reliable, minimally invasive ASD repair with an excellent long-term result.
机器人技术已应用于房间隔缺损(ASD)修复超过10年,但报告的病例数量有限,长期随访结果尚不清楚。本研究报告了一大组在单一机构接受心脏停搏或跳动状态下完全机器人辅助ASD修复的患者,并进行了7年的随访。
2007年至2013年,我院160例患者(中位年龄36岁;范围11 - 66岁)使用达芬奇机器人系统接受继发孔型ASD的选择性修复。前54例在心脏停搏下进行(心脏停搏组,n = 54),其余在心脏跳动下进行(心脏跳动组,n = 106)。缺损平均直径为2.9 cm(范围1.1 - 4.1 cm)。通过股血管和右颈内静脉插管建立体外循环。心脏停搏组使用经胸奇伍德夹诱导血液心脏停搏。在机器人手术系统的辅助下,通过右胸的三个8毫米端口、一个摄像端口和一个操作端口,进行有或无三尖瓣成形术的房间隔缺损修复。使用经食管超声心动图评估手术结果并进行随访。
所有患者术中经食管超声心动图均证实ASD完全闭合。无一例手术转为其他技术,无重大并发症。在阻断时间、手术持续时间和体外循环时间方面存在显著的学习曲线。心脏跳动组的手术和体外循环持续时间明显短于心脏停搏组(P = 0.000)。两组的机械通气时间、重症监护病房和住院时间以及引流量相似。在39±21个月的随访期间,无患者因残余分流或三尖瓣反流需要再次手术。
在机器人技术辅助下,可在心脏停搏或跳动状态下安全有效地进行ASD修复。这种完全内镜方法为寻求可靠、微创且长期效果良好的ASD修复的患者提供了一种选择。