Liboni A, Zamboni P, Mari C, Uzzau A, Salomoni C, Brunelli G, Buccoliero F, Donini I
G Chir. 1989 May;10(5):262-4.
The Authors report their experience with 222 esophagoenteric anastomoses, performed in 211 cases for malignant neoplasms (middle and lower third) of the esophagus or stomach. Particularly, they have performed 4 Sujura operations, 31 esophagogastric, 4 esophagocolic, 183 esophagojejunal anastomoses utilizing SPTU, ILS and EEA circular stapler. GIA was used in the preparation of the stomach before esophagogastroplasty. Mortality rate of the manual period (1970-1980: 114 cases operated) was 14.5% versus 2.2% of the stapling period (1981-1987: 222 cases operated). From the technical point of view reasons of the superiority of stapled technique are discussed and summarized as follows: 1) space not favourable for handsewn anastomoses; 2) stapled technique allows the surgeon to save anastomoses vascularization; 3) the stapler performs the suture simultaneously so to reduce tensile strength on the anastomoses and the fragile esophageal wall especially; 4) stapled agraphes are fixed in three points vs. the two points of the handsewn stitches.
作者报告了他们在211例食管癌或胃癌(食管中下段)恶性肿瘤患者中进行222例食管肠吻合术的经验。具体而言,他们进行了4例Sujura手术、31例食管胃吻合术、4例食管结肠吻合术、183例使用SPTU、ILS和EEA圆形吻合器的食管空肠吻合术。在食管胃成形术前准备胃时使用了GIA。手工吻合时期(1970 - 1980年:114例手术)的死亡率为14.5%,而吻合器吻合时期(1981 - 1987年:222例手术)的死亡率为2.2%。从技术角度讨论并总结了吻合器技术优越性的原因如下:1)不利于手工缝合吻合的空间;2)吻合器技术可使外科医生保留吻合口的血运;3)吻合器同时进行缝合,从而降低吻合口尤其是脆弱食管壁上的张力;4)吻合器吻合钉在三点固定,而手工缝合为两点固定。