Suppr超能文献

痴呆严重程度评定量表在区分轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病与对照组方面的效用。

The utility of the Dementia Severity Rating Scale in differentiating mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease from controls.

作者信息

Mitchell Joel C, Dick Malcolm B, Wood Amanda E, Tapp Andre M, Ziegler Raphael

机构信息

*VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle †Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA ‡Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.

出版信息

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2015 Jul-Sep;29(3):222-8. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000057.

Abstract

The current study investigated the utility of the Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) total score to identify individuals at the earliest stage of impairment (ie, mild cognitive impairment/MCI). In addition, the authors sought to investigate how well the measure correlates with an expanded battery of cognitive tests and other measures of functional abilities. Of the 320 participants included in this study, 85 were normal controls, 96 had single-domain or multiple-domain amnestic MCI, and 139 had possible or probable Alzheimer disease (AD). Each participant underwent a thorough cognitive, neurological, and physical examination. Results from this study indicated that the DSRS total scores differed significantly between the 3 groups (P<0.001) and accurately identified 81% of the control group, 60% of the MCI group, and 78% of the AD group in a post hoc discriminant analysis. When combined with a brief cognitive measure (ie, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Word List 5 min recall test), the DSRS accurately identified 98% of the control group, 76% of the MCI group, and 82% of the AD group. Implications for clinical practice and proposed areas of future research are discussed.

摘要

本研究调查了痴呆严重程度评定量表(DSRS)总分在识别处于损害最早阶段(即轻度认知障碍/MCI)个体方面的效用。此外,作者试图研究该量表与一系列扩展的认知测试以及其他功能能力测量指标之间的关联程度。在本研究纳入的320名参与者中,85名是正常对照者,96名患有单领域或多领域遗忘型MCI,139名患有可能或很可能的阿尔茨海默病(AD)。每位参与者都接受了全面的认知、神经和身体检查。本研究结果表明,DSRS总分在三组之间存在显著差异(P<0.001),并且在事后判别分析中准确识别出81%的对照组、60%的MCI组和78%的AD组。当与一项简短的认知测量指标(即阿尔茨海默病注册协会单词表5分钟回忆测试)相结合时,DSRS准确识别出98%的对照组、76%的MCI组和82%的AD组。文中讨论了对临床实践的启示以及未来研究的建议领域。

相似文献

1
The utility of the Dementia Severity Rating Scale in differentiating mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease from controls.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2015 Jul-Sep;29(3):222-8. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000057.

本文引用的文献

4
Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2: screening for MCI and dementia.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2011 Aug;26(5):389-98. doi: 10.1177/1533317511412046. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
7
Cognitive function and risk for depression in old age: a meta-analysis of published literature.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2011 May;23(4):516-25. doi: 10.1017/S1041610210000049. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
8
Rate of decline in Alzheimer disease measured by a Dementia Severity Rating Scale.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):268-74. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318194a324.
9
The measurement of everyday cognition (ECog): scale development and psychometric properties.
Neuropsychology. 2008 Jul;22(4):531-44. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.4.531.
10
3-year study of donepezil therapy in Alzheimer's disease: effects of early and continuous therapy.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;21(5-6):353-63. doi: 10.1159/000091790. Epub 2006 Feb 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验