Suppr超能文献

将chromID艰难梭菌琼脂与BBL艰难梭菌选择性琼脂用于检测粪便标本中艰难梭菌的性能比较

Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile agar compared with BBL C. difficile selective agar for detection of C. difficile in stool specimens.

作者信息

Han Sang Bong, Chang Jiyoung, Shin Sang Hyun, Park Kang Gyun, Lee Gun Dong, Park Yong Gyu, Park Yeon-Joon

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Lab Med. 2014 Sep;34(5):376-9. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.376. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of a new chromogenic medium for detection of Clostridium difficile, chromID C. difficile agar (CDIF; bioMérieux, France), by comparison with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; Becton Dickinson and Company, USA). After heat pre-treatment (80℃, 5 min), 185 diarrheal stool samples were inoculated onto the two media types and incubated anaerobically for 24 hr and 48 hr for CDIF and for 48 hr and 72 hr for CDSA. All typical colonies on each medium were examined by Gram staining, and the gram-positive rods confirmed to contain the tpi gene by PCR were identified as C. difficile. C. difficile was recovered from 36 samples by using a combination of the two media. The sensitivity with CDIF 48 hr was highest (100%) and was significantly higher than that with CDIF 24 hr (58.3%; P<0.001), because samples with a low burden of C. difficile tended to require prolonged incubation up to 48 hr (P<0.001). The specificity of CDIF 24 hr and CDIF 48 hr (99.3% and 90.6%, respectively) was significantly higher than that of CDSA 48 hr and CDSA 72 hr (72.5% and 67.1%, respectively; P<0.001). CDIF was effective for detecting C. difficile in heat-pretreated stool specimens, thus reducing unnecessary testing for toxin production in non-C. difficile isolates and turnaround time.

摘要

我们通过与BBL艰难梭菌选择性琼脂(CDSA;美国BD公司)进行比较,评估了一种用于检测艰难梭菌的新型显色培养基——chromID艰难梭菌琼脂(CDIF;法国生物梅里埃公司)的性能。经过热预处理(80℃,5分钟)后,将185份腹泻粪便样本接种到两种培养基上,CDIF在厌氧条件下培养24小时和48小时,CDSA在厌氧条件下培养48小时和72小时。对每种培养基上的所有典型菌落进行革兰氏染色检查,通过PCR确认含有tpi基因的革兰氏阳性杆菌被鉴定为艰难梭菌。通过两种培养基联用从36份样本中分离出了艰难梭菌。CDIF培养48小时时的敏感性最高(100%),且显著高于CDIF培养24小时时的敏感性(58.3%;P<0.001),因为艰难梭菌载量低的样本往往需要延长培养至48小时(P<0.001)。CDIF培养24小时和48小时时的特异性(分别为99.3%和90.6%)显著高于CDSA培养48小时和72小时时的特异性(分别为72.5%和67.1%;P<0.001)。CDIF对于检测经热预处理的粪便标本中的艰难梭菌有效,从而减少了对非艰难梭菌分离株进行毒素产生的不必要检测以及周转时间。

相似文献

6
Evaluation of the chromogenic agar chromID C. difficile.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):1002-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02601-12. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
7
Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for the detection of Clostridium difficile.
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Jul;55(4):994-8. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.4.994.
8
Isolation and quantitation of Clostridium difficile in aqueous and fecal matter using two types of selective media.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016 Jun;49(3):445-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
10
Comparison of culture based methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples in a research setting.
Anaerobe. 2014 Aug;28:226-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging Diagnostics in Infection.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 8;25(16):8672. doi: 10.3390/ijms25168672.
3
Colonization of Toxigenic Among Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Multi-Centre Cross-Sectional Study.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Jan 30;10:12. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00012. eCollection 2020.
4
Laboratory Diagnosis of Infection in Korea: The First National Survey.
Ann Lab Med. 2019 May;39(3):317-321. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.3.317.
5
Effect of the Synthetic Bile Salt Analog CamSA on the Hamster Model of Clostridium difficile Infection.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Sep 24;62(10). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02251-17. Print 2018 Oct.
6
Current knowledge on the laboratory diagnosis of infection.
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 7;23(9):1552-1567. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1552.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluation of the chromogenic agar chromID C. difficile.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):1002-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02601-12. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
3
The epidemiology of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based study.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan;107(1):89-95. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.398. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
4
Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile within 24 hours.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Nov;48(11):3852-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01288-10. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
7
Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture.
J Med Microbiol. 2005 Feb;54(Pt 2):187-191. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45844-0.
10
Germinability and heat resistance of spores of Clostridium difficile strains.
Microbiol Immunol. 1985;29(2):113-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1985.tb00809.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验