National Reference Laboratory for C. difficile, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):1002-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02601-12. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
Three selective media (chromID C. difficile agar, taurocholate cycloserine cefoxitin agar [TCCA; homemade], and CLO medium) were compared from 406 stool samples of patients suspected of having Clostridium difficile infection. The sensitivities of chromID C. difficile agar at 24 h and 48 h, CLO medium, and TCCA were 74.1%, 87%, 85.2%, and 70.4%, respectively.
三种选择性培养基(显色艰难梭菌琼脂、牛磺胆酸钠环丝氨酸头孢西丁琼脂[TCCA;自制]和CLO 培养基)比较了 406 例疑似艰难梭菌感染患者的粪便样本。显色艰难梭菌琼脂在 24 小时和 48 小时的灵敏度分别为 74.1%、87%、85.2%和 70.4%,CLO 培养基和 TCCA 的灵敏度分别为 74.1%、87%、85.2%和 70.4%。