Rhea Christopher K, Kiefer Adam W, Haran F J, Glass Stephen M, Warren William H
Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Center for Cognition, Action & Perception, Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Med Eng Phys. 2014 Nov;36(11):1473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
The maintenance of upright stance requires the simultaneous control of posture in both the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) dimensions. Postural sway is typically measured by quantifying the movement of the center of pressure (CoP) in the AP and ML dimensions independently. Metrics such as path length and 95% ellipse area have been developed to take into account movement in both the AP and ML directions, but these metrics only quantify the magnitude of the CoP movement. The movement of the CoP is technically a vector quantity with both magnitude and direction characteristics. The direction of displacement, or heading, of the CoP may provide further insight into the control of posture. Accordingly, we present a novel variable that describes the rate of change in direction of CoP displacement in two dimensions, the heading change (Δϕ), which is derived from the CoP heading (ϕ). We then compared the standard deviation (SD) and the dynamic structure characterized by sample entropy (SampEn) of the heading change time series to previously examined metrics presented in the literature (SD and SampEn of the AP and ML time series, path length, SD and SampEn of the CoP resultant magnitude time series) during a 60s single-leg stance performed by healthy participants and patients with a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) prior to surgical intervention. Patients with an ACL rupture exhibited a different dynamic structure in Δϕ compared to healthy controls, t(14)=2.44, p=0.029, whereas none of the other metrics differed between groups (all p>0.05). The novelty and utility of Δϕ is that it characterizes directional changes of the CoP, whereas previously documented postural control analyses describe only changes in magnitude.
维持直立姿势需要同时控制前后(AP)和内外侧(ML)方向的姿势。姿势摆动通常通过独立量化压力中心(CoP)在AP和ML方向上的移动来测量。已经开发了诸如路径长度和95%椭圆面积等指标来考虑AP和ML方向上的移动,但这些指标仅量化了CoP移动的幅度。CoP的移动在技术上是一个具有幅度和方向特征的向量量。CoP位移的方向或航向可能会为姿势控制提供进一步的见解。因此,我们提出了一个新的变量,即航向变化(Δϕ),它描述了二维中CoP位移方向的变化率,该变量是从CoP航向(ϕ)推导出来的。然后,我们比较了健康参与者和手术干预前前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂患者在60秒单腿站立期间航向变化时间序列的标准差(SD)和以样本熵(SampEn)为特征的动态结构,与文献中先前研究的指标(AP和ML时间序列的SD和SampEn、路径长度、CoP合向量幅度时间序列的SD和SampEn)。与健康对照组相比,ACL断裂患者在Δϕ方面表现出不同的动态结构,t(14)=2.44,p=0.029,而其他指标在两组之间没有差异(所有p>0.05)。Δϕ的新颖性和实用性在于它表征了CoP的方向变化,而先前记录的姿势控制分析仅描述了幅度变化。