Honnorat J
Neuro-oncologie, French Reference Center on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndrome, hôpital neurologique Pierre-Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Bron cedex, France; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Inserm U1028/CNRS UMR 5292, faculté Laennec, 9, rue Guillaume-Paradin, 69003 Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 43, boulevard du 11 novembre 1918, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2014 Oct;170(10):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
Initially, antibodies targeting intracellular compounds were described in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) such as anti-Hu, anti-Yo, anti-Ri or anti-CV2/CRMP5 antibodies. As more than 90% of patients with these antibodies suffer from an associated cancer, these antibodies were used as biomarkers of an underlying tumour. Recently, autoantibodies targeting cell-surface synaptic antigens have been described in patients with neurological symptoms suggesting PNS. These autoantibodies being less frequently associated with a tumour, they completely changed the concept of PNS. They lead to a new classification, not based on clinical symptoms or oncological status but on the location of the targeted antigens. Three groups of autoantibodies can be delineated according to the neuronal localization of the targeted antigen: Group 1: cytoplasmic neuronal antigens (CNA) (anti-Hu, Yo, CV2/CRMP5, Ri, Ma1/2, Sox, Zic4). Group 2: cell-surface neuronal antigens (CSNA) (anti-NMDAR, Lgi1, CASPR2, VGCC, AMPAr, GlyR, DNER, GABABR, GABAAR, IgLONS, mGluR1 and mGluR5). Group 3: intracellular synaptic antigens (ISA) (anti-GAD65 and anti-amphiphysin). More than being solely a classification of patients, these three groups are related to profound differences in the pathophysiology and in the pathogenic role of the associated autoantibody. According to the type of associated autoantibody, the age and sex of patients, physicians are now able to predict the presence or absence of tumour, the clinical evolution and prognostic and also the response to immunomodulator treatments that differ fundamentally from one group to the others.
最初,在患有副肿瘤性神经系统综合征(PNS)的患者中发现了靶向细胞内化合物的抗体,如抗Hu、抗Yo、抗Ri或抗CV2/CRMP5抗体。由于超过90%携带这些抗体的患者患有相关癌症,这些抗体被用作潜在肿瘤的生物标志物。最近,在有提示PNS的神经系统症状的患者中发现了靶向细胞表面突触抗原的自身抗体。这些自身抗体与肿瘤的关联频率较低,它们彻底改变了PNS的概念。它们导致了一种新的分类,不是基于临床症状或肿瘤状态,而是基于靶向抗原的位置。根据靶向抗原的神经元定位,可以划分出三组自身抗体:第1组:细胞质神经元抗原(CNA)(抗Hu、Yo、CV2/CRMP5、Ri、Ma1/2、Sox、Zic4)。第2组:细胞表面神经元抗原(CSNA)(抗NMDAR、Lgi1、CASPR2、VGCC、AMPAr、GlyR、DNER、GABABR、GABAAR、IgLONs、mGluR1和mGluR5)。第3组:细胞内突触抗原(ISA)(抗GAD65和抗 amphiphysin)。这三组不仅仅是患者的分类,它们还与病理生理学以及相关自身抗体的致病作用的深刻差异有关。根据相关自身抗体的类型、患者的年龄和性别,医生现在能够预测肿瘤的有无、临床进展和预后,以及对免疫调节剂治疗的反应,而不同组之间的免疫调节剂治疗反应存在根本差异。