Yamamoto Tomotaka, Tsuji Shoji
Department of Neurology, The University of Tokyo Hospital.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2010 Jun;37(6):995-1005.
The remote effects of malignant tumors in most cases of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes(PNS)are mediated by autoimmune processes against antigens shared by the tumor cells and the nervous tissue(onconeural antigens). Onconeural (or paraneoplastic)antibodies are broadly categorized into two groups according to the location of the corresponding onconeural antigens, inside or on the surface of neurons. Antibodies established as clinically relevant diagnostic markers for PNS are designated as well-characterized onconeural antibodies (or classical antibodies)that target intracellular antigens(Hu, Yo, Ri, CV2/CRMP5,Ma2, and amphiphysin). They also serve as useful markers in detecting primary tumors. Recent identification of new antibodies as markers of subtypes of limbic encephalitis has also expanded the concept of autoimmune limbic encephalitis. These autoantibodies are directed to neuronal cell-surface antigens including neurotransmitter receptors(NMDA, AMPA, and GABAB receptors)and ion channels(VGKC). They are less frequently associated with cancer, so that they cannot be used as specific markers for PNS. Autoimmune limbic encephalitis with anti-neuronal cell surface antobodies and paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis with classical antibodies overlap in some clinical features but are pathophysiologically distinct. Classical antibodies are not simple tumor markers. They seem to be closely related to the disease mechanisms because specific intrathecal synthesis has been shown in PNS patients. However, attempts to produce an animal model of PNS by passive transfer of these antibodies have been unsuccessful, and there is no direct evidence demonstrating the pathogenic role of classical antibodies. Instead, some circumstantial evidence, including pathological studies showing extensive infiltrates of T cells in the CNS of the patients, supports the hypothesis that cytotoxic-T cell mechanisms cause irreversible neuronal damage. On the other hand, humoral immune response is probably the principal mechanism in autoimmune encephalitis associated with antibodies against neuronal cell-surface antigens. Those antibodies are supposed to mediate neural dysfunction which may be reversed by immunosuppression therapy, while the exact mechanism remains to be elucidated. Further accumulation of the cases and longer observation would be necessary to delineate the clinical spectrum of each type of newly-identified autoimmune limbic encephalitis. Early diagnosis and optimal oncological treatment is a prerequisite for better prognosis of PNS patients. Detection of the primary tumor at very early stages including carcinoma in situ is a challenging issue. Optimization of immunosuppression/ immunomodulation therapy for each patient according to the underlying pathophysiological processes is another important clinical issue.
在大多数副肿瘤性神经系统综合征(PNS)病例中,恶性肿瘤的远隔效应是由针对肿瘤细胞和神经组织共有的抗原(肿瘤神经抗原)的自身免疫过程介导的。根据相应肿瘤神经抗原在神经元内部或表面的位置,肿瘤神经(或副肿瘤)抗体大致可分为两类。已被确立为PNS临床相关诊断标志物的抗体被指定为靶向细胞内抗原(Hu、Yo、Ri、CV2/CRMP5、Ma2和 amphiphysin)的特征明确的肿瘤神经抗体(或经典抗体)。它们在检测原发性肿瘤方面也可作为有用的标志物。最近将新抗体鉴定为边缘性脑炎亚型的标志物,也扩展了自身免疫性边缘性脑炎的概念。这些自身抗体针对神经元细胞表面抗原,包括神经递质受体(NMDA、AMPA和GABAB受体)和离子通道(VGKC)。它们与癌症的关联较少,因此不能用作PNS的特异性标志物。伴有抗神经元细胞表面抗体的自身免疫性边缘性脑炎和伴有经典抗体的副肿瘤性边缘性脑炎在一些临床特征上有重叠,但在病理生理上是不同的。经典抗体不是简单的肿瘤标志物。它们似乎与疾病机制密切相关,因为在PNS患者中已显示有特异性鞘内合成。然而,通过被动转移这些抗体来建立PNS动物模型的尝试尚未成功,并且没有直接证据证明经典抗体的致病作用。相反,一些间接证据,包括病理研究显示患者中枢神经系统中有广泛的T细胞浸润,支持细胞毒性T细胞机制导致不可逆神经元损伤的假说。另一方面,体液免疫反应可能是与抗神经元细胞表面抗原抗体相关的自身免疫性脑炎的主要机制。这些抗体被认为介导神经功能障碍,免疫抑制治疗可能会使其逆转,但其确切机制仍有待阐明。需要进一步积累病例并进行更长时间的观察,以描绘每种新发现的自身免疫性边缘性脑炎的临床谱。早期诊断和最佳肿瘤治疗是PNS患者获得更好预后的前提。在包括原位癌在内的极早期阶段检测原发性肿瘤是一个具有挑战性的问题。根据潜在的病理生理过程为每位患者优化免疫抑制/免疫调节治疗是另一个重要的临床问题。