Faria Rita, Barbieri Marco, Light Kate, Elliott Rachel A, Sculpher Mark
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Br Med Bull. 2014 Sep;111(1):45-61. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldu021.
This review scopes the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve suboptimal use of medicines in order to determine the evidence gaps and help inform research priorities.
Systematic searches of the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects.
The majority of the studies evaluated interventions to improve adherence, inappropriate prescribing and prescribing errors.
Interventions tend to be specific to a particular stage of the pathway and/or to a particular disease and have mostly been evaluated for their effect on intermediate or process outcomes.
Medicines optimization offers an opportunity to improve health outcomes and efficiency of healthcare.
The available evidence is insufficient to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions to address suboptimal medicine use in the UK NHS. Decision modelling, evidence synthesis and elicitation have the potential to address the evidence gaps and help prioritize research.
本综述审视了关于改善用药不当的干预措施的有效性和成本效益的证据,以确定证据空白并为研究重点提供信息。
对英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)经济评估数据库、Cochrane系统评价数据库和效果评价文摘数据库进行系统检索。
大多数研究评估了改善依从性、不适当处方和处方错误的干预措施。
干预措施往往特定于用药流程的某个特定阶段和/或某种特定疾病,并且大多已针对其对中间或过程结果的影响进行了评估。
药物优化为改善健康结果和提高医疗保健效率提供了机会。
现有证据不足以评估英国国家医疗服务体系中解决用药不当问题的干预措施的有效性和成本效益。决策建模、证据综合和证据引出有可能填补证据空白并帮助确定研究重点。