• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多利益相关者方法共同制定药品优化研究议程。

A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, England.

University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, England.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5
PMID:33441135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7804576/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is 'a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines'. The purpose of this exercise was to co-produce a prioritised research agenda for medicines optimisation using a multi-stakeholder (patient, researcher, public and health professionals) approach.

METHODS

A three-stage, multiple method process was used including: generation of preliminary research questions (Stage 1) using a modified Nominal Group Technique; electronic consultation and ranking with a wider multi-stakeholder group (Stage 2); a face-to-face, one-day consensus meeting involving representatives from all stakeholder groups (Stage 3).

RESULTS

In total, 92 research questions were identified during Stages 1 and 2 and ranked in order of priority during stage 3. Questions were categorised into four areas: 'Patient Concerns' [e.g. is there a shared decision (with patients) about using each medicine?], 'Polypharmacy' [e.g. how to design health services to cope with the challenge of multiple medicines use?], 'Non-Medical Prescribing' [e.g. how can the contribution of non-medical prescribers be optimised in primary care?], and 'Deprescribing' [e.g. what support is needed by prescribers to deprescribe?]. A significant number of the 92 questions were generated by Patient and Public Involvement representatives, which demonstrates the importance of including this stakeholder group when identifying research priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of research questions was generated reflecting concerns which affect patients, practitioners, the health service, as well the ethical and philosophical aspects of the prescribing and deprescribing of medicines. These questions should be used to set future research agendas and funding commissions.

摘要

背景

多达 50%的药物未被按预期使用,导致健康状况不佳和经济后果不佳。药物优化是“一种以患者为中心的安全有效使用药物的方法,旨在确保患者从药物中获得最佳效果”。本研究旨在采用多利益相关者(患者、研究人员、公众和卫生专业人员)方法共同制定药物优化的优先研究议程。

方法

使用包括三个阶段和多种方法的过程,包括:使用改良的名义小组技术生成初步研究问题(第 1 阶段);与更广泛的多利益相关者群体进行电子咨询和排名(第 2 阶段);涉及所有利益相关者群体代表的面对面为期一天的共识会议(第 3 阶段)。

结果

在第 1 阶段和第 2 阶段共确定了 92 个研究问题,并在第 3 阶段按优先级进行了排名。这些问题分为四个领域:“患者关注”[例如,是否与患者共同决定使用每种药物?]、“多种药物使用”[例如,如何设计卫生服务以应对多种药物使用的挑战?]、“非医疗处方”[例如,如何优化初级保健中非医疗处方者的贡献?]和“去处方”[例如,处方者需要什么支持来减少药物的使用?]。患者和公众参与代表提出了大量的问题,这表明在确定研究重点时,纳入这一利益相关者群体非常重要。

结论

提出了广泛的研究问题,反映了影响患者、从业者、卫生服务以及处方和去处方药物的伦理和哲学方面的问题。这些问题应被用于制定未来的研究议程和资助委员会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9728/7805178/f70c9cdde7ac/12913_2021_6056_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9728/7805178/f70c9cdde7ac/12913_2021_6056_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9728/7805178/f70c9cdde7ac/12913_2021_6056_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation.多利益相关者方法共同制定药品优化研究议程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5.
2
Person-centred medicines optimisation policy in England: an agenda for research on polypharmacy.英格兰以患者为中心的药物优化政策:多重用药研究议程
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Jan;18(1):24-34. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000207. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis.多学科药物审查和减少老年人用药干预措施在初级保健中为何能良好运行?一项实际审查和综合研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04256-8.
4
Optimising a person-centred approach to stopping medicines in older people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy using the DExTruS framework: a realist review.使用 DExTruS 框架优化多病症和多种药物治疗的老年人以患者为中心的停药方法:一项现实主义综述。
BMC Med. 2022 Aug 31;20(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02475-1.
5
What factors are important for deprescribing in Australian long-term care facilities? Perspectives of residents and health professionals.在澳大利亚长期护理机构中,哪些因素对于减药很重要?居民和健康专业人员的观点。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 10;6(3):e009781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009781.
6
What do older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy think about deprescribing? The LESS study - a primary care-based survey.患有多种合并症和多种药物治疗的老年人对减少药物治疗有何看法?LESS 研究 - 基于初级保健的调查。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 31;20(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01843-x.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Person-Centred Care Including Deprescribing for Older People.以患者为中心的护理,包括老年人的减药管理
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jul 25;7(3):101. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030101.
9
Co-designing an intervention to improve the process of deprescribing for older people living with frailty in the United Kingdom.共同设计一项干预措施,以改善英国衰弱老年人减药过程。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):399-408. doi: 10.1111/hex.13669. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
10
What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study.在临床试验中,哪些是最重要的未解决的研究问题?一项詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系:PRioRiTy II(随机试验中优先考虑保留率)研究。
Trials. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3687-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming multi-stakeholder engagement towards coproduction of optimized maternal, newborn, and child health and a resilient community health system in rural Ethiopia: A qualitative study.在埃塞俄比亚农村地区将多利益相关方参与转变为共同生产优化的孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康及具有韧性的社区卫生系统:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0330159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330159. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-term results of a multidisciplinary medication optimization program for older adults including primary care and hospital team.一项针对老年人的多学科药物优化计划的长期结果,该计划包括初级保健和医院团队。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Oct;81(10):1461-1471. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03889-5. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Involving Citizen-Patients in the Development of Telehealth Services: Qualitative Study of Experts' and Citizen-Patients' Perspectives.让患者参与远程医疗服务的开发:专家与患者视角的定性研究
J Particip Med. 2018 Nov 12;10(4):e10665. doi: 10.2196/10665.
2
Agreeing on global research priorities for medication safety: an international prioritisation exercise.达成全球药物安全研究重点共识:一项国际优先排序实践。
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010422. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010422.
3
Evidence supporting the best clinical management of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a systematic guideline review and expert consensus.
Brain injury, mental health and substance use in homeless populations: community-generated recommendations for healthcare service delivery and research.
无家可归人群中的脑损伤、心理健康与物质使用:社区提出的医疗服务提供与研究建议
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 17;25(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12835-1.
4
Development of a complex multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention in primary care for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy.为患有衰弱和多重用药的老年人开展一项复杂的多学科药物评估与减药干预的初级保健项目。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 22;20(4):e0319615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319615. eCollection 2025.
5
Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.消费者参与初级保健中药物安全干预或服务的设计和开发:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70092. doi: 10.1111/hex.70092.
6
Exploring medication self-management in polypharmacy: a qualitative systematic review of patients and healthcare providers perspectives.探索多重用药情况下的药物自我管理:对患者和医疗服务提供者观点的定性系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1426777. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1426777. eCollection 2024.
7
Effects of a multicomponent communication training to involve older people in decisions to DEPRESCRIBE cardiometabolic medication in primary care (CO-DEPRESCRIBE): protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded process and economic evaluation.多组分沟通培训对参与老年人决定减少初级保健中心心血管代谢药物的影响(CO-DEPRESCRIBE):一项包含过程和经济评估的集群随机对照试验方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 11;25(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02465-7.
8
Identifying and prioritizing research to inform a research agenda for Canadian chiropractors working in sport - the Canadian sports chiropractic perspective.确定研究重点并为加拿大从事运动领域工作的脊医制定研究议程——加拿大运动脊医视角。
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022 Dec;66(3):227-243.
支持多病共存和多种药物治疗患者最佳临床管理的证据:系统指南综述和专家共识。
J Intern Med. 2019 Mar;285(3):272-288. doi: 10.1111/joim.12842. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.患者介导的干预措施以改善专业实践。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 11;9(9):CD012472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012472.pub2.
5
Identification of behaviour change techniques in deprescribing interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.识别减药干预措施中的行为改变技术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;84(12):2716-2728. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13742. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
6
Attitudes toward concordance and self-efficacy in decision making: a cross-sectional study on pharmacist-patient consultations.决策中对一致性和自我效能的态度:药师与患者咨询的横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Apr 23;12:615-624. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S159113. eCollection 2018.
7
How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation.公众参与在英国主流健康研究中的嵌入程度如何?政策实施十年后的一项现实主义评估。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Apr;23(2):98-106. doi: 10.1177/1355819617750688.
8
Impact of Deprescribing Interventions in Older Hospitalised Patients on Prescribing and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials.老年住院患者撤药干预对处方和临床结局的影响:随机试验的系统评价
Drugs Aging. 2018 Apr;35(4):303-319. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0536-4.
9
Setting the top 10 research priorities to improve the health of people with Type 2 diabetes: a Diabetes UK-James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.确定改善2型糖尿病患者健康状况的十大研究重点:英国糖尿病协会-詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目
Diabet Med. 2018 Jul;35(7):862-870. doi: 10.1111/dme.13613. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
10
Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.英国社区药店的患者和公众观点:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2018 Apr;21(2):409-428. doi: 10.1111/hex.12639. Epub 2017 Nov 8.