• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性胆汁性胆管炎中的免疫反应与食管静脉曲张

Immunological response and oesophageal varices in PBC.

作者信息

Tsukada Y, Akiyama N, Suda Y, Saitou T, Uchikoshi Y, Ishihara K, Shimizu T, Asakura H

机构信息

Third Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1989;4 Suppl 1:60-2.

PMID:2519087
Abstract

A retrospective study was made of the clinical features, especially oesophageal varices, of 93 patients with PBC. The 5 year survival rate of asymptomatic PBC patients was 88.7% and that of symptomatic PBC was 43.7%. The 5 year survival rate of the group with oesophageal varices was 44.0% and that of the group without varices was 68.8%. The 5 year survival rate of the patients with high-risk varices was 39.1% and of those without high-risk varices was 67.9%. Management of variceal bleeding in PBC patients was considered very difficult. In prognostic study, the patients with the prophylactic therapy were better than the patients with emergency or elective therapy. The antiM8 (a subtype of antimitochondrial antibody) positive patients had poor prognosis compared with antiM8 negative patients. Therefore, it was concluded from these data that some kind of treatment was necessary for patients with high-risk varices. In particular, it was considered necessary to monitor closely the patients whose serum alkaline phosphatase levels had remained high.

摘要

对93例原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者的临床特征,尤其是食管静脉曲张进行了回顾性研究。无症状PBC患者的5年生存率为88.7%,有症状PBC患者的5年生存率为43.7%。有食管静脉曲张组的5年生存率为44.0%,无静脉曲张组为68.8%。高危静脉曲张患者的5年生存率为39.1%,无高危静脉曲张患者为67.9%。PBC患者的静脉曲张出血处理被认为非常困难。在预后研究中,接受预防性治疗的患者比接受急诊或择期治疗的患者预后更好。抗M8(抗线粒体抗体的一个亚型)阳性患者与抗M8阴性患者相比预后较差。因此,从这些数据得出结论,高危静脉曲张患者需要某种治疗。特别是,认为有必要密切监测血清碱性磷酸酶水平持续升高的患者。

相似文献

1
Immunological response and oesophageal varices in PBC.原发性胆汁性胆管炎中的免疫反应与食管静脉曲张
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1989;4 Suppl 1:60-2.
2
Esophagogastric varices as a prognostic factor for the determination of clinical stage in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(11):1060-5. doi: 10.1007/s00535-003-1196-6.
3
Prevalence and predictors of esophageal varices in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的患病率及预测因素
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jul;5(7):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.031. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
4
Earlier recurrence of esophageal varices, following therapy, in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) compared with non-PBC patients.与非原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者相比,原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者在接受治疗后食管静脉曲张复发更早。
J Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov;39(11):1085-9. doi: 10.1007/s00535-004-1447-1.
5
Which patients with primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis should undergo endoscopic screening for oesophageal varices detection?哪些原发性胆汁性肝硬化或原发性硬化性胆管炎患者应接受内镜检查以筛查食管静脉曲张?
Gut. 2005 Mar;54(3):407-10. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.040832.
6
The natural history of PBC: has it changed?原发性胆汁性胆管炎的自然病史:它有变化吗?
Semin Liver Dis. 2005 Aug;25(3):321-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916323.
7
Prevalence and associated factors with esophageal varices in early primary biliary cirrhosis.原发性胆汁性肝硬化早期食管静脉曲张的患病率及相关因素。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Aug;27(8):1320-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07114.x.
8
Overlap of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis: long-term outcomes.自身免疫性肝炎与原发性胆汁性肝硬化的重叠:长期预后
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jun;102(6):1244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01136.x. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
9
Variceal bleeding is associated with reduced risk of severe cholestasis in primary biliary cirrhosis.在原发性胆汁性肝硬化中,静脉曲张出血与严重胆汁淤积风险降低相关。
Q J Med. 1989 May;71(265):467-71.
10
Endoscopic sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices. A clinical study.食管静脉曲张的内镜硬化治疗。一项临床研究。
Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1985;524:1-86.