Silveira Marina G, Talwalkar Jayant A, Angulo Paul, Lindor Keith D
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jun;102(6):1244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01136.x. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
The coexistence of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has been called "overlap syndrome," but diagnosis is challenging and the natural history of this syndrome has not been demonstrated. The importance of the diagnosis of PBC-AIH overlap is due to potential therapeutic options. Patients with PBC should receive ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA); the role of and response to additional immunosuppressive therapy are unknown when AIH overlaps PBC.
We reviewed 135 patients with PBC according to a revised scoring system proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAHG). Twenty-six patients had features of PBC-AIH overlap and 109 did not. Mean follow-up was 6.1 yr for overlap syndrome patients and 5.4 yr in PBC patients. There was a higher rate of portal hypertension (P=0.01), esophageal varices (P<0.01), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (P=0.02), ascites (P<0.01), and death and/or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) (P<0.05) in the overlap group.
In conclusion, esophageal varices, GI bleeding, ascites, and death and/or OLT were more common in the overlap group. The higher risk of symptomatic portal hypertension and worse outcomes in patients with PBC overlap syndrome may justify the risks of immunosuppressive therapy. Large randomized studies are necessary to establish optimal therapeutic strategies.
原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)与自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)并存被称为“重叠综合征”,但诊断具有挑战性,且该综合征的自然病史尚未得到证实。PBC-AIH重叠综合征诊断的重要性在于潜在的治疗选择。PBC患者应接受熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)治疗;当AIH与PBC重叠时,额外免疫抑制治疗的作用及反应尚不清楚。
我们根据国际自身免疫性肝炎小组(IAHG)提出的修订评分系统对135例PBC患者进行了回顾性研究。26例患者具有PBC-AIH重叠综合征的特征,109例则没有。重叠综合征患者的平均随访时间为6.1年,PBC患者为5.4年。重叠组的门静脉高压发生率更高(P = 0.01)、食管静脉曲张发生率更高(P < 0.01)、胃肠道(GI)出血发生率更高(P = 0.02)、腹水发生率更高(P < 0.01),死亡和/或原位肝移植(OLT)发生率更高(P < 0.05)。
总之,并组食管静脉曲张、胃肠道出血、腹水以及死亡和/或原位肝移植更为常见。PBC重叠综合征患者出现症状性门静脉高压的风险更高且预后更差,这可能证明免疫抑制治疗的风险是合理的。需要进行大型随机研究以确立最佳治疗策略。