Barbhuiya Mustafa, Bhunia Shushruta, Kakkar Manisha, Shrivastava Braj, Tiwari Pramod K, Gupta Sanjiv
Centre for Genomics, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
J Cytol. 2014 Jan;31(1):20-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.130634.
Patients presenting with mass lesions of liver and gallbladder are a common occurrence in a cancer hospital in north central part of India. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) serves as first line of pathological investigations, but there are pros and cons involved.
The main objective of the present study was to establish adequacy of the procedure and to find out diagnostic pitfalls. An attempt was made to analyze inconclusive and inadequate aspirations.
A total of 400 consecutive fine-needle aspirates of liver, belonging to 328 cases over a period of 2 years, were analyzed. Hematoxylin and eosin and May-Grόnwald-Giemsa stains were used. Chi-square test was carried out to compare significant degree of difference in different kind of diagnosis.
Out of 400 aspirations, 289 (72.2%) were adequate, 75 (18.7%), inconclusive and 36 (9%), inadequate. Among positive aspirations the most common was metastatic adenocarcinoma, 128 (44.2%). The positive diagnosis and adequate aspirations were significantly high (P < 0.0001). Major differential diagnostic problems were: Distinguishing the poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma from the metastatic adenocarcinoma; and leukemia/lymphoma from other malignant round cell tumors. Common diagnostic pitfalls were repeated aspirations from the necrotic area and aspiration of atypical, disorganized and reactive hepatocytes, adjacent to a metastasis. No complications were observed.
FNAC can be used successfully for the diagnosis of liver and gallbladder lesions, thus avoiding open biopsy. Study indicates the potential of using FNAC in clinical intervention where the incidence of gall-bladder and liver cancer is very high and open biopsy and surgery are not an option.
在印度中北部的一家癌症医院,出现肝脏和胆囊肿块病变的患者很常见。细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是病理检查的一线方法,但存在利弊。
本研究的主要目的是确定该检查方法的充分性,并找出诊断中的陷阱。尝试分析不确定和不充分的穿刺结果。
对2年内328例患者的400例连续肝脏细针穿刺样本进行分析。使用苏木精和伊红染色以及迈-格-姬染色。采用卡方检验比较不同诊断类型的显著差异程度。
在400例穿刺样本中,289例(72.2%)充分,75例(18.7%)不确定,36例(9%)不充分。在阳性穿刺样本中,最常见的是转移性腺癌,共128例(44.2%)。阳性诊断和充分穿刺的比例显著较高(P < 0.0001)。主要的鉴别诊断问题包括:区分低分化肝细胞癌与转移性腺癌;以及区分白血病/淋巴瘤与其他恶性圆形细胞瘤。常见的诊断陷阱包括对坏死区域的重复穿刺以及对转移灶附近非典型、无序和反应性肝细胞的穿刺。未观察到并发症。
FNAC可成功用于肝脏和胆囊病变的诊断,从而避免开放性活检。研究表明,在胆囊和肝癌发病率很高且开放性活检和手术不可行的临床干预中,FNAC具有应用潜力。