Centre for Mental Health and Risk, University of Manchester, Manchester.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;75(8):e809-16. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08899.
To compare risks for suicidality and criminality in a national cohort of people diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and to assess how risk factor profiles differ between these outcomes.
We conducted 2 case-cohort studies using interlinked Swedish national registers. Primarily, using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding, we identified 15,337 people diagnosed with bipolar disorder, 1973-2009, matched by age and gender to 20 individuals per case sampled randomly from the general population. We estimated risks of suicide and hospital-presenting attempted suicide, and violent and nonviolent criminal offending. We separately assessed these risks among 14,677 unaffected siblings matched to a second general population sample.
22.2% of bipolar disorder cohort members engaged in suicidal or criminal acts after diagnosis. They were at greatly elevated risk for completed suicide (risk ratio = 18.8; 95% CI, 16.0-22.2), attempted suicide (risk ratio = 14.3; 95% CI, 13.5-15.2), violent crime (risk ratio = 5.0; 95% CI, 4.6-5.4), and nonviolent crime (risk ratio = 2.9; 95% CI, 2.8-3.1) compared with the general population. Elevations in risk were far less marked among the unaffected siblings than in the bipolar disorder cohort. Three factors independently predicted raised risk of all 4 adverse outcomes: if the first 2 patient episodes for bipolar disorder required admission, a history of attempted suicide, and a history of diagnosed alcohol/drug disorder. Criminal offending before bipolar diagnosis was an especially strong independent predictor of criminality after diagnosis.
The combined risk of suicidality or criminality is substantially elevated in both relative and absolute terms. Clinical prediction rules focusing on multiple vulnerabilities following onset of bipolar disorder, especially when there is history of attempted suicide, substance misuse disorders, or criminal offending, may improve risk management.
比较在诊断为双相情感障碍的全国队列人群中自杀和犯罪风险,并评估这些结局之间的风险因素谱有何不同。
我们进行了两项基于病例队列的研究,使用了相互关联的瑞典国家登记处。首先,我们使用国际疾病分类(ICD)编码,确定了 1973-2009 年间 15337 名被诊断为双相情感障碍的患者,按年龄和性别与每个病例匹配 20 名随机从一般人群中抽取的个体。我们估计了自杀和医院就诊企图自杀、暴力和非暴力犯罪的风险。我们分别在与第二个一般人群样本匹配的 14677 名未受影响的兄弟姐妹中评估了这些风险。
双相情感障碍队列成员中有 22.2%在诊断后实施了自杀或犯罪行为。他们的自杀完成风险显著升高(风险比=18.8;95%CI,16.0-22.2),自杀未遂风险(风险比=14.3;95%CI,13.5-15.2),暴力犯罪(风险比=5.0;95%CI,4.6-5.4)和非暴力犯罪(风险比=2.9;95%CI,2.8-3.1)比一般人群高。与双相情感障碍队列相比,未受影响的兄弟姐妹的风险升高幅度要小得多。有三个因素独立预测了所有 4 种不良结局的风险增加:如果双相情感障碍的前两个患者发作需要住院治疗、有自杀未遂史、以及有诊断的酒精/药物障碍史。在双相诊断之前的犯罪行为是诊断后犯罪的一个特别强的独立预测因素。
自杀或犯罪的综合风险从相对和绝对两方面来看都显著升高。以双相情感障碍发作后出现的多种脆弱性为重点的临床预测规则,特别是当有自杀未遂、物质使用障碍或犯罪行为史时,可能会改善风险管理。