• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入路对经导管主动脉瓣置入术操作及中期随访的影响:13项研究和10468例患者的荟萃分析

Impact of access on TAVI procedural and midterm follow-up: a meta-analysis of 13 studies and 10,468 patients.

作者信息

Conrotto Federico, D'Ascenzo Fabrizio, Francesca Giordana, Colaci Chiara, Sacciatella Paolo, Biondi-Zoccai Giuseppe, Moretti Claudio, D'Amico Maurizio, Gaita Fiorenzo, Marra Sebastiano

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Oct;27(5):500-8. doi: 10.1111/joic.12141. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1111/joic.12141
PMID:25196312
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may be performed using the transfemoral (TF) or transapical (TA) approach in most patients with aortic stenosis. The impact of access choice on peri-procedural and midterm results remains to be defined.

METHODS

Medline and Cochrane Library were searched for articles describing differences in baseline, peri-procedural, and midterm outcomes among patients undergoing TF or TA TAVI. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality after at least 1-year follow-up, while secondary end-points were 30 days mortality and in-hospital complications (bleeding and cerebrovascular events). The independent impact of access choice was evaluated with pooled analysis using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 10,468 patients were included. TF was the most exploited strategy (69.5% vs. 30.5%). After adjusting for confounding variables, 30-day and midterm follow-up mortality (median 365 days, range 222-400) were lower in TF patients with a pooled adjusted odds ratio of 0.81 (0.68-0.97 I(2) 99%) and 0.85 (0.80-0.90 I(2) 96%), respectively. Regarding periprocedural outcomes, TF reduced risk of bleedings and strokes (OR of 0.74 [0.66-0.82 I(2) 95%] and 0.91 [0.83-0.99] I(2) 86%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The TF approach reduces mortality in TAVI patients, due to lower rates of periprocedural bleedings and strokes.

摘要

引言

对于大多数主动脉瓣狭窄患者,可采用经股动脉(TF)或经心尖(TA)途径进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)。入路选择对围手术期和中期结果的影响仍有待确定。

方法

检索Medline和Cochrane图书馆,查找描述接受TF或TA TAVI患者的基线、围手术期和中期结果差异的文章。主要终点是至少1年随访后的全因死亡率,次要终点是30天死亡率和住院并发症(出血和脑血管事件)。使用随机效应模型进行汇总分析,评估入路选择的独立影响。

结果

纳入13项研究,共10468例患者。TF是最常用的策略(69.5%对30.5%)。在调整混杂变量后,TF患者的30天和中期随访死亡率(中位数365天,范围222 - 400天)较低,汇总调整后的优势比分别为0.81(0.68 - 0.97,I² 99%)和0.85(0.80 - 0.90,I² 96%)。关于围手术期结果,TF降低了出血和中风风险(优势比分别为0.74 [0.66 - 0.82,I² 95%]和0.91 [0.83 - 0.99],I² 86%)。

结论

由于围手术期出血和中风发生率较低,TF途径降低了TAVI患者的死亡率。

相似文献

1
Impact of access on TAVI procedural and midterm follow-up: a meta-analysis of 13 studies and 10,468 patients.入路对经导管主动脉瓣置入术操作及中期随访的影响:13项研究和10468例患者的荟萃分析
J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Oct;27(5):500-8. doi: 10.1111/joic.12141. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
2
A meta-analysis of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients undergoing transfemoral versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation using edwards valve for severe aortic stenosis.一项关于使用爱德华兹瓣膜进行经股动脉与经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的死亡率及主要不良心血管和脑血管事件的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 15;114(12):1882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.029. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
3
A meta-analysis of transfemoral versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation on 30-day and 1-year outcomes.经股动脉与经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术对30天和1年结局影响的荟萃分析。
Heart Surg Forum. 2015 Aug 30;18(4):E161-6. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1388.
4
Transfemoral, transapical and transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of early and mid-term deaths.经股动脉、经心尖和经导管主动脉瓣植入术及外科主动脉瓣置换术:早期和中期死亡的直接和校正间接比较的荟萃分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;25(3):484-492. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx150.
5
European real world trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: systematic review and meta-analysis of European national registries.欧洲经导管主动脉瓣植入术的真实世界研究:对欧洲各国注册研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Nov 29;11(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0552-6.
6
Learning Curves Among All Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Germany: A Retrospective Observational Study.德国所有接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的学习曲线:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 15;235:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.138. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Transapical versus transfemoral aortic valve implantation: a multicenter collaborative study.经心尖与经股主动脉瓣置换术:一项多中心合作研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.088. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
8
Intermediate Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的中期临床和血流动力学结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):881-8; Dissicussion 888. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.032. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
9
Regional left ventricular function after transapical vs. transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation analysed by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking.经心尖与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术后局部左心室功能的心脏磁共振特征追踪分析
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Oct;15(10):1168-76. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu103. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
10
Comparison of early and midterm outcomes after transsubclavian/axillary versus transfemoral, transapical, or transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经锁骨下动脉/腋窝与经股动脉、经心尖或经主动脉途径行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的早期和中期结果比较。
Heart Lung. 2019 Nov-Dec;48(6):519-529. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Transfemoral Compared to Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Chronic Dialysis-Dependent Patients.慢性透析依赖患者经股动脉与经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 29;14(1):135. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010135.
2
Alternative access in transcatheter aortic valve replacement-an updated focused review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的替代入路——最新聚焦综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 8;11:1437626. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1437626. eCollection 2024.
3
The role of external iliac artery diameter indexed to BSA score in predicting vascular access complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
以体表面积评分校正的髂外动脉直径在预测经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术后血管通路并发症中的作用。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024 Mar;20(1):76-83. doi: 10.5114/aic.2024.136407. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Clinical outcomes following transapical TAVR with ACURATE in the CHANGE neo TA study.CHANGE neo TA研究中经心尖使用ACURATE进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的临床结局。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Aug 31;36:100862. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100862. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Young Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Review.年轻低风险重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术:综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 14;7:608158. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.608158. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic stenosis at low-intermediate risk.低中风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者外科主动脉瓣置换术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Apr;10(2):135-144. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2020.02.11.
7
A New Experimental Device for Transapical Access of the Aortic and Mitral Valves as well as the Aorta in its Various Segments.一种用于经心尖进入主动脉瓣、二尖瓣以及主动脉各节段的新型实验装置。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 May-Jun;32(3):156-161. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0013.
8
Suture Forces for Closure of Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Mathematical Model.经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术闭合的缝合力:一种数学模型
J Heart Valve Dis. 2016 Jul;25(4):424-429.
9
Impact of clinical and procedural factors upon C reactive protein dynamics following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后临床和手术因素对C反应蛋白动态变化的影响。
World J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 26;8(7):425-31. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i7.425.