• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为医疗设备的价值评估生成适当的临床数据:监管发挥着什么作用?

Generating appropriate clinical data for value assessment of medical devices: what role does regulation play?

作者信息

Tarricone Rosanna, Torbica Aleksandra, Ferré Francesca, Drummond Mike

机构信息

CERGAS (Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management), Università Bocconi, Via Roentgen, 1 20136 Milan (MI), Italy.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Oct;14(5):707-18. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.950233. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1586/14737167.2014.950233
PMID:25196848
Abstract

Assessing the value of health technologies, through health technology assessment is critically dependent on the existence of relevant and robust clinical data on the efficacy, safety and ideally, effectiveness of the technologies concerned. However, in the case of medical devices, such clinical data may not always be available, because of the different nature of the regulatory requirements in different jurisdictions. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the regulatory requirements in seven major jurisdictions in order to identify current challenges and to suggest possible improvements. There are differences in the requirements across jurisdictions and in the balance between pre-market and post-market controls. Several improvements are required in order to generate adequate clinical data for health technology assessment.

摘要

通过卫生技术评估来评估卫生技术的价值,严重依赖于有关技术的疗效、安全性以及理想情况下的有效性的相关且可靠的临床数据的存在。然而,就医疗设备而言,由于不同司法管辖区监管要求的性质不同,此类临床数据可能并非总能获取。因此,我们对七个主要司法管辖区的监管要求进行了系统综述,以确定当前面临的挑战并提出可能的改进建议。不同司法管辖区的要求以及上市前和上市后控制之间的平衡存在差异。为了生成用于卫生技术评估的充分临床数据,需要进行若干改进。

相似文献

1
Generating appropriate clinical data for value assessment of medical devices: what role does regulation play?为医疗设备的价值评估生成适当的临床数据:监管发挥着什么作用?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Oct;14(5):707-18. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.950233. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
2
Automated devices for identifying peripheral arterial disease in people with leg ulceration: an evidence synthesis and cost-effectiveness analysis.用于识别下肢溃疡患者外周动脉疾病的自动化设备:证据综合和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(37):1-158. doi: 10.3310/TWCG3912.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
4
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.左心室辅助装置作为晚期心力衰竭的终末期治疗的临床和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(38):1-237. doi: 10.3310/MLFA4009.
5
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
6
MRI software and cognitive fusion biopsies in people with suspected prostate cancer: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.磁共振成像软件联合认知融合活检用于疑似前列腺癌患者:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效果分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(61):1-310. doi: 10.3310/PLFG4210.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Digital interventions in mental health: evidence syntheses and economic modelling.数字干预在精神健康中的应用:证据综合和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(1):1-182. doi: 10.3310/RCTI6942.
9
Anti-VEGF drugs compared with laser photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and economic analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子药物与激光光凝术治疗糖尿病视网膜病变的比较:系统评价与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May 7:1-16. doi: 10.3310/KRWP1264.
10
Coverage with evidence development: the Ontario experience.循证医保覆盖:安大略省的经验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Apr;27(2):159-68. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000018.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaps in the evidence underpinning high-risk medical devices in Europe at market entry, and potential solutions.高风险医疗器械在进入欧洲市场时的证据基础存在差距,以及潜在的解决方案。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jul 25;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02801-7.
2
Implementation of coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices: A decision tool for late technology adopter countries.医疗器械证据开发计划覆盖的实施:晚期技术采用国的决策工具。
Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):195-206. doi: 10.1002/hec.4504. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
Value-Based procurement for medical devices: A scoping review.
基于价值的医疗器械采购:一项范围综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Oct 13;35:134. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.134. eCollection 2021.
4
Evidence-based funding of new imaging applications and technologies by Medicare in Australia: How it happens and how it can be improved.澳大利亚医保对新影像应用和技术的循证资金资助:其实施方式和改进途径。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar;66(2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13386.
5
Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review.探讨涉及辅助阴道分娩的侵入性操作的 RCT 报告标准:系统评价。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jul;262:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.026. Epub 2021 May 14.
6
Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges.医疗设备在中东欧的 HTA 走向何方?解决方法学挑战的建议。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:612410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410. eCollection 2020.
7
Endovascular versus surgical creation of arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients: Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses.血管内与手术方式建立血液透析患者动静脉瘘的效果比较:成本效益和预算影响分析。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Jan;22(1):48-57. doi: 10.1177/1129729820921021. Epub 2020 May 19.
8
Defining the clinician's role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation - a systematic review.定义医疗器械创新早期卫生技术评估中临床医生的角色 - 系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 23;19(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4305-9.
9
What type of clinical evidence is needed to assess medical devices?评估医疗器械需要何种类型的临床证据?
Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Sep;25(141):259-65. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0016-2016.
10
Effects of procurement practices on quality of medical device or service received: a qualitative study comparing countries.采购做法对所获医疗器械或服务质量的影响:一项比较不同国家的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 8;16(a):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1610-4.