Catalano Sarah R, Whittington Ian D, Donnellan Stephen C, Gillanders Bronwyn M
Marine Parasitology Laboratory, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Southern Seas Ecology Laboratories, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Marine Parasitology Laboratory, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia ; Parasitology Section, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2013 Dec 12;3(2):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.11.001. eCollection 2014 Aug.
We review the use of parasites as biological tags of marine fishes and cephalopods in host population structure studies. The majority of the work published has focused on marine fish and either single parasite species or more recently, whole parasite assemblages, as biological tags. There is representation of host organisms and parasites from a diverse range of taxonomic groups, although focus has primarily been on host species of commercial importance. In contrast, few studies have used parasites as tags to assess cephalopod population structure, even though records of parasites infecting cephalopods are well-documented. Squid species are the only cephalopod hosts for which parasites as biological tags have been applied, with anisakid nematode larvae and metacestodes being the parasite taxa most frequently used. Following a brief insight into the importance of accurate parasite identification, the population studies that have used parasites as biological tags for marine fishes and cephalopods are reviewed, including comments on the dicyemid mesozoans. The advancement of molecular genetic techniques is discussed in regards to the new ways parasite genetic data can be incorporated into population structure studies, alongside host population genetic analyses, followed by an update on the guidelines for selecting a parasite species as a reliable tag candidate. As multiple techniques and methods can be used to assess the population structure of marine organisms (e.g. artificial tags, phenotypic characters, biometrics, life history, genetics, otolith microchemistry and parasitological data), we conclude by commenting on a holistic approach to allow for a deeper insight into population structuring.
我们回顾了寄生虫在宿主种群结构研究中作为海洋鱼类和头足类生物标签的应用。已发表的大部分研究工作都集中在海洋鱼类以及单个寄生虫物种上,或者更近一些,集中在作为生物标签的整个寄生虫组合上。尽管主要关注的是具有商业重要性的宿主物种,但研究涵盖了来自不同分类群的宿主生物和寄生虫。相比之下,很少有研究使用寄生虫作为标签来评估头足类种群结构,尽管关于感染头足类的寄生虫记录已有充分记载。鱿鱼种类是唯一应用寄生虫作为生物标签的头足类宿主,异尖线虫幼虫和绦虫蚴是最常使用的寄生虫分类群。在简要了解准确鉴定寄生虫的重要性之后,我们回顾了将寄生虫用作海洋鱼类和头足类生物标签的种群研究,包括对双胚虫中生动物的评论。讨论了分子遗传技术的进展,涉及将寄生虫遗传数据纳入种群结构研究的新方法,以及与宿主种群遗传分析一起的情况,随后更新了选择寄生虫物种作为可靠标签候选者的指南。由于可以使用多种技术和方法来评估海洋生物的种群结构(例如人工标签、表型特征、生物测量学、生活史、遗传学、耳石微化学和寄生虫学数据),我们最后评论了一种整体方法,以便更深入地了解种群结构。