Redmond John M, Gupta Asheesh, Hammarstedt Jon E, Stake Christine E, Dunne Kevin F, Domb Benjamin G
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, U.S.A.
American Hip Institute, Westmont, Illinois, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of multiple demographic and radiographic findings on the size of labral tears identified at the time of hip arthroscopy.
Data were prospectively collected for patients treated with arthroscopic labral repair or debridement from February 2008 to August 2011. Preoperative radiographic and demographic data were collected for 392 patients during the study period. Exclusion criteria included revision surgery and previous hip conditions. An anteroposterior pelvic view, 45° Dunn view, and false-profile view were used to measure Tönnis grade, neck-shaft angle, alpha angle, lateral center edge angle (LCEA), anterior center edge angle (ACEA), acetabular inclination, and the extent of crossover sign when present. At the time of surgery, labral tear size and location were documented for all patients, using traditional acetabular clock face nomenclature for sizing. A multiple linear regression analysis was then performed to assess the correlation of radiographic and demographic findings with the size of the labral tear.
Regression analysis displayed statistical significance for sex (P < .0001), age (P < .0001), and alpha angle (P = .005) with labral tear size. For female patients, Tönnis grade (P = .0004) and neck-shaft angle (P = .004) correlated with labral tear size. This model accounted for only 26% of variation in labral tear size.
Preoperative risk factors for the extent of labral tear size are male sex, increasing age, and increasing alpha angle. Labral tears were larger in female patients with higher Tönnis grades and lower neck-shaft angles. Measurements of acetabular coverage and version showed no correlation with labral tear size. The majority of labral tear size variation was not accounted for in this model.
Level IV, therapeutic case series.
本研究旨在探讨多种人口统计学和影像学检查结果对髋关节镜检查时发现的盂唇撕裂大小的影响。
前瞻性收集2008年2月至2011年8月接受关节镜下盂唇修复或清创治疗的患者的数据。在研究期间,收集了392例患者的术前影像学和人口统计学数据。排除标准包括翻修手术和既往髋关节疾病。使用骨盆前后位片、45°邓恩位片和假轮廓位片测量Tönnis分级、颈干角、α角、外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)、前侧中心边缘角(ACEA)、髋臼倾斜度以及存在交叉征时的范围。手术时,使用传统的髋臼钟面命名法对所有患者的盂唇撕裂大小和位置进行记录。然后进行多元线性回归分析,以评估影像学和人口统计学检查结果与盂唇撕裂大小之间的相关性。
回归分析显示,性别(P <.0001)、年龄(P <.0001)和α角(P =.005)与盂唇撕裂大小具有统计学意义。对于女性患者,Tönnis分级(P =.0004)和颈干角(P =.004)与盂唇撕裂大小相关。该模型仅解释了盂唇撕裂大小变异的26%。
盂唇撕裂大小的术前危险因素为男性、年龄增加和α角增大。Tönnis分级较高且颈干角较低的女性患者的盂唇撕裂较大。髋臼覆盖度和旋转的测量结果与盂唇撕裂大小无关。该模型未解释大部分盂唇撕裂大小的变异。
IV级,治疗性病例系列。