Maldonado David R, Chen Sarah L, Chen Jeffery W, Shapira Jacob, Rosinksy Philip J, Annin Shawn, Lall Ajay C, Domb Benjamin G
American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA.
Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 27;8(7):2325967120935079. doi: 10.1177/2325967120935079. eCollection 2020 Jul.
Labral tears are the most common abnormalities in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Appropriate management is crucial, as it has been shown that better overall outcomes can be achieved with labral restoration.
To report the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at minimum 2-year follow-up of patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Data were prospectively collected for patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique. Patients were excluded if they had prior hip conditions, prior ipsilateral surgery, Tönnis grade >1, a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <25°, or workers' compensation claims. Preoperative and postoperative scores at minimum 2-year follow-up were recorded for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The proportion of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the mHHS, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12 were also reported.
A total of 309 hips were included. The mean patient age was 36.2 years (range, 12.8-75.9 years). The mean preoperative LCEA and alpha angle were 31.9° and 57.1°, respectively. A significant improvement on the mHHS (62.6 ± 15.7 preoperatively vs 86.9 ± 16.2 at 2-year follow-up), NAHS (63.1 ± 16.7 vs 86.1 ± 16.7), and HOS-SSS (39.8 ± 22.0 vs 74.2 ± 27.3) was found ( < .001 for all). A significant decrease was shown for VAS scores ( < .001). Also, 78.6% and 82.2% of patients achieved the MCID and PASS for the mHHS, respectively; 60.8% and 69.9% of patients met the MCID and PASS for the HOS-SSS, respectively; and the MCID for the iHOT-12 was met by 77.3% of patients.
In the setting of FAIS and labral tears, patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique demonstrated significant improvement in several validated PRO measures, the VAS pain score, and patient satisfaction at a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Based on this evidence, labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique seems to be a safe option.
盂唇撕裂是接受髋关节镜手术患者中最常见的异常情况。恰当的处理至关重要,因为已有研究表明,盂唇修复能带来更好的总体疗效。
报告在股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)背景下,采用无结可控张力解剖技术进行髋关节镜下盂唇撕裂修复手术的患者,至少随访2年的患者报告结局(PROs)。
病例系列;证据等级,4级。
前瞻性收集采用无结可控张力解剖技术进行髋关节镜下FAIS盂唇撕裂修复手术患者的数据。若患者既往有髋关节疾病、同侧既往手术史、Tönnis分级>1、外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)<25°或有工伤赔偿申请,则将其排除。记录至少随访2年时的改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)、髋关节结局评分 - 运动特定子量表(HOS - SSS)、国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT - 12)以及疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)的术前和术后评分。还报告了达到mHHS、HOS - SSS和iHOT - 12最小临床重要差异(MCID)或患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的患者比例。
共纳入309例髋关节。患者平均年龄为36.2岁(范围12.8 - 75.9岁)。术前平均LCEA和α角分别为31.9°和57.1°。发现mHHS(术前62.6±15.7,随访2年时86.9±16.2)、NAHS(63.1±16.7 vs 86.1±16.7)和HOS - SSS(39.8±22.0 vs 74.2±27.3)均有显著改善(所有P <.001)。VAS评分显著降低(P <.001)。此外,分别有78.6%和82.2%的患者达到mHHS的MCID和PASS;分别有60.8%和69.9%的患者达到HOS - SSS的MCID和PASS;77.3%的患者达到iHOT - 12的MCID。
在FAIS和盂唇撕裂的情况下,采用无结可控张力解剖技术进行髋关节镜下盂唇撕裂修复手术的患者,在至少2年的随访中,多项经过验证的PRO指标、VAS疼痛评分和患者满意度均有显著改善。基于此证据,采用无结可控张力解剖技术进行盂唇撕裂修复似乎是一种安全的选择。