Harris-Love Michael O, Joe Galen, Davenport Todd E, Koziol Deloris, Abbett Rose Kristen, Shrader Joseph A, Vasconcelos Olavo M, McElroy Beverly, Dalakas Marinos C
Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Apr;67(4):563-70. doi: 10.1002/acr.22473.
The Adult Myopathy Assessment Tool (AMAT) is a 13-item performance-based battery developed to assess functional status and muscle endurance. The purpose of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the AMAT in adults with myositis.
Nineteen raters (13 physical therapists and 6 physicians) scored videotaped recordings of patients with myositis performing the AMAT for a total of 114 tests and 1,482 item observations per session. Raters rescored the AMAT test and item observations during a followup session (mean ± SD 19 ± 6 days between scoring sessions). All raters completed a single, self-directed, electronic training module prior to the initial scoring session.
Intrarater and interrater reliability correlation coefficients were ≥0.94 for the AMAT functional subscale, endurance subscale, and total score (all P < 0.02 for Ho , ρ ≤0.75). All AMAT items had satisfactory intrarater agreement (kappa statistics with Fleiss-Cohen weights, with values κw = 0.57-1.00). Interrater agreement was acceptable for each AMAT item (κ = 0.56-0.89) except the sit up (κ = 0.16). The standard error of measurement and 95% confidence interval range for the AMAT total scores did not exceed 2 points across all observations (AMAT total score range 0-45).
The AMAT is a reliable, domain-specific assessment of functional status and muscle endurance for adult subjects with myositis. Results of this study suggest that physicians and physical therapists may reliably score the AMAT following a single training session. The AMAT functional subscale, endurance subscale, and total score exhibit interrater and intrarater reliability suitable for clinical and research use.
成人肌病评估工具(AMAT)是一个由13项基于表现的测试组成的组合,用于评估功能状态和肌肉耐力。本研究的目的是确定AMAT在成年肌炎患者中的评分者内信度和评分者间信度。
19名评分者(13名物理治疗师和6名医生)对肌炎患者进行AMAT测试的录像进行评分,每次测试共114次,每次测试有1482项观察指标。评分者在随访期间(两次评分之间的平均间隔时间±标准差为19±6天)对AMAT测试和项目观察结果进行重新评分。所有评分者在初次评分前完成了一个单一的、自主的电子培训模块。
AMAT功能子量表、耐力子量表和总分的评分者内信度和评分者间信度相关系数均≥0.94(对于原假设H₀:ρ≤0.75,所有P<0.02)。所有AMAT项目的评分者内一致性良好(采用Fleiss-Cohen权重的kappa统计,κw值为0.57-1.00)。除仰卧起坐项目(κ=0.16)外,各AMAT项目的评分者间一致性均可接受(κ=0.56-0.89)。在所有观察中,AMAT总分的测量标准误和95%置信区间范围均未超过2分(AMAT总分范围为0-45)。
AMAT是一种可靠的、针对特定领域的成年肌炎患者功能状态和肌肉耐力评估工具。本研究结果表明,医生和物理治疗师在经过一次培训后可以可靠地对AMAT进行评分。AMAT功能子量表、耐力子量表和总分具有适合临床和研究使用的评分者间和评分者内信度。