Suppr超能文献

循环游离DNA在非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体突变状态检测中的诊断价值:一项系统评价和Meta分析

Diagnostic value of circulating free DNA for the detection of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Luo Jie, Shen Li, Zheng Di

机构信息

1] Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200433, China [2].

Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200433, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2014 Sep 9;4:6269. doi: 10.1038/srep06269.

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is a reliable and sensitive biomarker for EGFR-TKI therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, detection of EGFR mutation in tissues has obvious limitations. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) has been reported as an alternative approach for the detection of EGFR mutations. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to assess the diagnostic performance of cfDNA, compared with tissues. True-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), false-negative (FN), and true-negative (TN) values were extracted or calculated for each study. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) and area under curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance. 20 eligible studies involving 2012 cases were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.674 (95%CI: 0.517-0.800), 0.935 (95%CI: 0.888-0.963), 10.307 (95%CI: 6.167-17.227), 0.348 (95%CI: 0.226-0.537), and 29.582 (95%CI: 4.582-60.012), respectively. The AUC was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95). The meta-analysis suggests that detection of EGFR mutation by cfDNA is of adequate diagnostic accuracy and cfDNA analysis could be a promising screening test for NSCLC.

摘要

表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变是用于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)治疗的可靠且敏感的生物标志物。然而,组织中EGFR突变的检测存在明显局限性。循环游离DNA(cfDNA)已被报道为检测EGFR突变的一种替代方法。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估cfDNA与组织相比的诊断性能。为每项研究提取或计算真阳性(TP)、假阳性(FP)、假阴性(FN)和真阴性(TN)值。计算合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断比值比(DOR)。采用汇总的受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)来评估总体诊断性能。本荟萃分析纳入了涉及2012例患者的20项符合条件的研究。合并敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR和DOR分别为0.674(95%CI:0.517 - 0.800)、0.935(95%CI:0.888 - 0.963)、10.307(95%CI:6.167 - 17.227)、0.348(95%CI:0.226 - 0.537)和29.582(95%CI:4.582 - 60.012)。AUC为0.93(95%CI:0.90 - 0.95)。荟萃分析表明,通过cfDNA检测EGFR突变具有足够的诊断准确性,cfDNA分析可能是一种有前景的NSCLC筛查检测方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee7/5385820/8b1818af01f2/srep06269-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验