Keeley Robert D, Burke Brian L, Brody David, Dimidjian Sona, Engel Matthew, Emsermann Caroline, deGruy Frank, Thomas Marshall, Moralez Ernesto, Koester Steve, Kaplan Jessica
From the Department of Family Medicine (RDK, CE, FdG), the Department of Internal Medicine (DB), the Department of Psychiatry (MT), and the Department of Health and Behavioral Sciences (SK), University of Colorado, Denver; Denver Health, Denver, CO (RDK, DB, ME); the Department of Psychology, Fort Lewis College, Durango, CO (BLB); the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder (SD); and Emory University School of Medicine (JK).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;27(5):621-36. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.05.130324.
The goal of this study was to assess the effects of training primary care providers (PCPs) to use Motivational Interviewing (MI) when treating depressed patients on providers' MI performance and patients' expressions of interest in depression treatment ("change talk") and short-term treatment adherence.
This was a cluster randomized trial in urban primary care clinics (3 intervention, 4 control). We recruited 21 PCPs (10 intervention, 11 control) and 171 English-speaking patients with newly diagnosed depression (85 intervention, 86 control). MI training included a baseline and up to 2 refresher classroom trainings, along with feedback on audiotaped patient encounters. We report summary measures of technical (rate of MI-consistent statements per 10 minutes during encounters) and relational (global rating of "MI Spirit") MI performance, the association between MI performance and number of MI trainings attended (0, 1, 2, or 3), and rates of patient change talk regarding depression treatments (physical activity, antidepressant medication). We report PCP use of physical activity recommendations and antidepressant prescriptions and patients' short-term physical activity level and prescription fill rates.
Use of MI-consistent statements was 26% higher for MI-trained versus control PCPs (P = .005). PCPs attending all 3 MI trainings (n = 6) had 38% higher use of MI-consistent statements (P < .001) and were over 5 times more likely to show beginning proficiency in MI Spirit (P = .036) relative to control PCPs. Although PCPs' use of physical activity recommendations and antidepressant prescriptions was not significantly different by randomization arm, patients seen by MI-trained PCPs had more frequent change talk (P = .001). Patients of MI-trained PCPs also expressed change talk about physical activity 3 times more frequently (P = .01) and reported more physical activity (3.05 vs 1.84 days in the week after the visit; P = .007) than their counterparts visiting untrained PCPs. Change talk about antidepressant medication and fill rates were similar by randomization arm (P > .05 for both).
MI training resulted in improved MI performance, more depression-related patient change talk, and better short-term adherence.
本研究的目的是评估培训初级保健提供者(PCP)在治疗抑郁症患者时使用动机性访谈(MI)对提供者的MI表现、患者对抑郁症治疗的兴趣表达(“改变谈话”)以及短期治疗依从性的影响。
这是一项在城市初级保健诊所进行的整群随机试验(3个干预组,4个对照组)。我们招募了21名PCP(10名干预组,11名对照组)和171名新诊断为抑郁症的英语患者(85名干预组,86名对照组)。MI培训包括一次基线培训和最多两次复习课堂培训,以及对录音的患者诊疗过程的反馈。我们报告技术方面(诊疗过程中每10分钟MI一致性陈述的比例)和关系方面(“MI精神”的总体评分)的MI表现的汇总指标、MI表现与参加MI培训次数(0、1、2或3次)之间的关联,以及患者关于抑郁症治疗(体育活动、抗抑郁药物)的改变谈话的比例。我们报告PCP对体育活动建议和抗抑郁药物处方的使用情况以及患者的短期体育活动水平和处方填充率。
接受MI培训的PCP与对照组PCP相比,MI一致性陈述的使用高出26%(P = 0.005)。参加所有3次MI培训的PCP(n = 6)与对照组PCP相比,MI一致性陈述的使用高出38%(P < 0.001),并且在MI精神方面表现出初步熟练的可能性高出5倍多(P = 0.036)。尽管按随机分组,PCP对体育活动建议和抗抑郁药物处方的使用没有显著差异,但接受MI培训的PCP诊疗的患者有更频繁的改变谈话(P = 0.001)。接受MI培训的PCP的患者关于体育活动的改变谈话频率也高出3倍(P = 0.01),并且报告的体育活动更多(就诊后一周内分别为3.05天和1.84天;P = 0.007),高于就诊未接受培训的PCP的患者。按随机分组,关于抗抑郁药物的改变谈话和填充率相似(两者P > 0.05)。
MI培训导致MI表现改善、与抑郁症相关的患者改变谈话增多以及更好的短期依从性。