Suppr超能文献

动机性访谈改善初级保健中的抑郁结局:一项集群随机试验。

Motivational interviewing improves depression outcome in primary care: A cluster randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Services, Denver Health.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado-Denver.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Nov;84(11):993-1007. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000124. Epub 2016 Sep 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of Motivational Interviewing (MI) conducted by primary care providers on rates of improvement over time for depressive symptoms and remission among low-income patients with newly diagnosed Major Depressive Disorder.

METHOD

Ten care teams were randomized to MI with standard management of depression (MI-SMD; 4 teams, 10 providers, 88 patients) or SMD alone (6 teams, 16 providers, 80 patients). Patients were assessed at 6, 12 and 36 weeks with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Treatment receipt was ascertained through patient inquiry and electronic records. Audio-recorded index encounters were evaluated for mediators of improved depressive symptoms (providers' MI ability and patient language favoring participating in treatment or other depression related mood-improving behaviors).

RESULTS

In Intention-To-Treat analyses, MI-SMD was associated with a more favorable trajectory of PHQ-9 depressive symptom scores than SMD alone (randomization group × time interaction estimate = 0.13, p = .018). At 36 weeks, MI-SMD was associated with improved depressive symptoms (Cohen's d = 0.41, 95% CI [0.11, 0.72]) and remission rate (Success Rate Difference = 14.53 [1.79, 27.26]) relative to SMD alone. MI-SMD was not associated with a significant group x time interaction for remission, or with increased receipt of antidepressant medication or specialty mental health counseling. The providers' ability to direct clinical discussions toward treating depression, and the patients' language favoring engagement in mood-improving behaviors, mediated the effects of MI-SMD on depressive symptoms (ps < .05).

DISCUSSION

Training providers to frame discussions about depression using MI may improve upon standard management for depression. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目的

考察初级保健提供者实施动机访谈(MI)对新诊断为重度抑郁症的低收入患者抑郁症状随时间改善率和缓解率的影响。

方法

10 个护理团队随机分为 MI 联合标准抑郁管理组(MI-SMD,4 个团队,10 名提供者,88 名患者)和单纯标准管理组(SMD,6 个团队,16 名提供者,80 名患者)。患者在第 6、12 和 36 周时采用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)进行评估。通过患者询问和电子病历来确定治疗的接受情况。对记录的索引访谈进行评估,以确定改善抑郁症状的中介因素(提供者的 MI 能力和患者语言,倾向于参与治疗或其他与抑郁相关的改善情绪的行为)。

结果

意向治疗分析显示,与单纯 SMD 相比,MI-SMD 与 PHQ-9 抑郁症状评分的更有利轨迹相关(随机分组×时间交互作用估计值=0.13,p=0.018)。在 36 周时,与单纯 SMD 相比,MI-SMD 与改善的抑郁症状(Cohen's d=0.41,95%CI[0.11, 0.72])和缓解率(成功率差异=14.53[1.79, 27.26])相关。MI-SMD 与缓解的显著组×时间交互作用、抗抑郁药物或专业心理健康咨询的增加使用无关。提供者将临床讨论导向治疗抑郁的能力以及患者语言倾向于参与改善情绪的行为,中介了 MI-SMD 对抑郁症状的影响(p<0.05)。

讨论

培训提供者使用 MI 来构建关于抑郁的讨论,可能会改善对抑郁的标准管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验