Seidenfeld David
Senior Researcher, American Institutes for Research, 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, Washington, DC 20007..
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Sep;45(3):379-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00397.x.
More than US$800 million per year is spent on programs in low- and middle-income countries to increase demand for condoms, yet in rural areas of Africa condoms are often distributed for free only by regional health clinics that may be located far from home. Anecdotal evidence suggests that limited supply, resulting primarily from long travel times to acquire condoms, is a major barrier to use. This study investigates the potential unmet demand for condoms in rural sub-Saharan Africa. I provide empirical evidence of the importance of supply effects, based on an evaluation of a distribution program in which nine agents were enlisted to sell condoms across 92 rural villages in Zambia. I find that the number of individuals acquiring condoms tripled and the number of condoms distributed rose by more than 250 percent. The study demonstrates that individuals in poor rural areas are willing to pay for condoms and provides a model whereby public health goods can be acquired through market forces without the government incurring large costs and without detracting from public health services.
每年有超过8亿美元用于中低收入国家的项目,以增加对避孕套的需求,但在非洲农村地区,避孕套通常仅由可能离家很远的地区卫生诊所免费发放。轶事证据表明,供应有限(主要是由于获取避孕套的路途时间长)是使用避孕套的主要障碍。本研究调查了撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区对避孕套潜在的未满足需求。基于对一项分发项目的评估,我提供了供应效应重要性的实证证据,该项目招募了九名代理商在赞比亚的92个农村村庄销售避孕套。我发现购买避孕套的人数增加了两倍,分发的避孕套数量增加了250%以上。该研究表明,贫困农村地区的个人愿意购买避孕套,并提供了一个模式,通过市场力量获取公共卫生用品,而无需政府承担巨大成本,也不会减损公共卫生服务。