• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

华盛顿州汉福德场地高地栖息地生物活性区的深度:对修复和生态风险管理的启示

Depth of the biologically active zone in upland habitats at the Hanford Site, Washington: Implications for remediation and ecological risk management.

作者信息

Sample Bradley E, Lowe John, Seeley Paul, Markin Melanie, McCarthy Chris, Hansen Jim, Aly Alaa H

机构信息

Ecological Risk, Rancho Murieta, California, USA.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2015 Jan;11(1):150-60. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1581. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1002/ieam.1581
PMID:25209119
Abstract

Soil invertebrates, mammals, and plants penetrate and exploit the surface soil layer (i.e., the biologically active zone) to varying depths. As the US Department of Energy remediates radioactive and hazardous wastes in soil at the Hanford Site, a site-specific definition of the biologically active zone is needed to identify the depth to which remedial actions should be taken to protect the environment and avoid excessive cleanup expenditures. This definition may then be considered in developing a point of compliance for remediation in accordance with existing regulations. Under the State of Washington Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA), the standard point of compliance for soil cleanup levels with unrestricted land use is 457 cm (15 ft) below ground surface. When institutional controls are required to control excavations to protect people, MTCA allows a conditional point of compliance to protect biological resources based on the depth of the biologically active zone. This study was undertaken to identify and bound the biologically active zone based on ecological resources present at the Hanford Site. Primary data were identified describing the depths to which ants, mammals, and plants may exploit the surface soil column at the Hanford Site and other comparable locations. The maximum depth observed for harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) was 270 cm (8.9 ft), with only trivial excavation below 244 cm (8 ft). Badgers (Taxidea taxus) are the deepest burrowing mammal at the Hanford Site, with maximum burrow depths of 230 cm (7.6 ft); all other mammals did not burrow below 122 cm (4 ft). Shrubs are the deepest rooting plants with rooting depths to 300 cm (9.8 ft) for antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata). The 2 most abundant shrub species did not have roots deeper than 250 cm (8.2 ft). The deepest rooted forb had a maximum root depth of 240 cm (7.9 ft). All other forbs and grasses had rooting depths of 200 cm (6.6 ft) or less. These data indicate that the biologically active soil zone in the Hanford Central Plateau does not exceed 300 cm (9.8 ft), the maximum rooting depth for the deepest rooting plant. The maximum depth at which most other plant and animal species occur is substantially shallower. Spatial distribution and density of burrows and roots over depths were also evaluated. Although maximum excavation by harvester ants is 270 cm (8.9 ft), trivial volume of soil is excavated below 150 cm (∼5 ft). Maximum rooting depths for all grasses, forbs, and the most abundant and deepest rooting shrubs are 300 cm (9.8 ft) or less. Most root biomass (>50-80%) is concentrated in the top 100 cm (3.3 ft), whereas at the maximum depth (9.8 ft), only trace root biomass is present. Available data suggest a limited likelihood for significant transport of contaminants to the surface by plants at or below 244 cm (8 ft), and suggest that virtually all plants or animal species occurring on the Central Plateau have a negligible likelihood for transporting soil contaminants to the surface from depths at or below 305 cm (10 ft).

摘要

土壤无脊椎动物、哺乳动物和植物会穿透并利用地表土壤层(即生物活性区)至不同深度。随着美国能源部对汉福德场地土壤中的放射性和有害废物进行修复,需要一个特定场地的生物活性区定义,以确定应采取修复行动的深度,从而保护环境并避免过度的清理费用。然后,在根据现有法规制定修复合规点时可考虑这一定义。根据华盛顿州的《模范有毒物质控制法》(MTCA),无限制土地使用情况下土壤清理水平的标准合规点是地面以下457厘米(15英尺)。当需要进行制度控制以控制挖掘活动来保护人员时,MTCA允许基于生物活性区的深度设立一个有条件的合规点来保护生物资源。本研究旨在根据汉福德场地现有的生态资源来确定并界定生物活性区。已确定了主要数据,描述了蚂蚁、哺乳动物和植物在汉福德场地及其他类似地点可能利用地表土壤柱的深度。收获蚁(Pogonomyrmex spp.)观察到的最大深度为270厘米(8.9英尺),在244厘米(8英尺)以下仅有少量挖掘。獾(Taxidea taxus)是汉福德场地挖掘洞穴最深的哺乳动物,洞穴最大深度为230厘米(7.6英尺);所有其他哺乳动物挖掘洞穴的深度都未超过122厘米(4英尺)。灌木是扎根最深的植物,叉叶苦荆(Purshia tridentata)的扎根深度可达300厘米(9.8英尺)。两种最常见的灌木物种的根系深度未超过250厘米(8.2英尺)。扎根最深的草本植物的最大根深度为240厘米(7.9英尺)。所有其他草本植物和草类的扎根深度为200厘米(6.6英尺)或更浅。这些数据表明,汉福德中央高原的生物活性土壤区不超过300厘米(9.8英尺),即扎根最深植物的最大扎根深度。大多数其他动植物物种出现的最大深度要浅得多。还评估了洞穴和根系在不同深度的空间分布和密度。尽管收获蚁的最大挖掘深度为270厘米(8.9英尺),但在150厘米(约5英尺)以下挖掘的土壤量很少。所有草类、草本植物以及最常见和扎根最深的灌木的最大扎根深度为300厘米(9.8英尺)或更浅。大多数根系生物量(>50 - 80%)集中在顶部100厘米(3.3英尺),而在最大深度(9.8英尺)时,仅存在微量根系生物量。现有数据表明,在244厘米(8英尺)及以下深度的植物将污染物大量传输至地表的可能性有限,并且表明在中央高原上几乎所有动植物物种将土壤污染物从305厘米(10英尺)及以下深度传输至地表的可能性可忽略不计。

相似文献

1
Depth of the biologically active zone in upland habitats at the Hanford Site, Washington: Implications for remediation and ecological risk management.华盛顿州汉福德场地高地栖息地生物活性区的深度:对修复和生态风险管理的启示
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2015 Jan;11(1):150-60. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1581. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
2
The biologically active zone in upland habitats at the Hanford Site, Washington, USA: Focus on plant rooting depth and biomobilization.美国华盛顿汉福德场址旱地生境中的生物活跃区:重点关注植物根系深度和生物可移动性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Jul;14(4):442-446. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4044. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
3
Evaluation of ecological resources at operating facilities at contaminated sites: The Department of Energy's Hanford Site as a case study.评估污染场地运行设施的生态资源:以美国能源部的汉福德场址为例。
Environ Res. 2019 Mar;170:452-462. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.052. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
Importance of root uptake of CO on C transfer to plants impacted by below-ground CH release.根系吸收CO对受地下CH释放影响的碳向植物转移的重要性。
J Environ Radioact. 2019 May;201:5-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
5
Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.补救后对生态资源造成的风险主要可能是由于成功恢复后资源价值的增加:以美国能源部汉福德场址为例。
Environ Res. 2020 Jul;186:109536. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109536. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
6
Natural attenuation/phytoremediation in the vadose zone of a former industrial sludge basin.某 former industrial sludge basin 的渗流区中的自然衰减/植物修复。 (注:原英文中“former industrial sludge basin”这里“former”翻译为“某”更合适,因为原词意思不太明确,可能是“先前的工业污泥池”等意思,这里意译为“某”使其更通顺)
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2001;8(4):243-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02987400.
7
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes.陆地生物群落根系分布的全球分析。
Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):389-411. doi: 10.1007/BF00333714.
8
Importance of buffer lands to determining risk to ecological resources at legacy contaminated sites: A case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, Washington, USA.缓冲地带对确定遗留污染场地生态资源风险的重要性:以美国华盛顿州能源部汉福德场地为例。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2019;82(22):1151-1163. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2019.1702911. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Pilot-scale in situ bioremediation of HMX and RDX in soil pore water in Hawaii.夏威夷土壤孔隙水中 HMX 和 RDX 的现场生物修复中试研究。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2013 Oct;15(11):2023-9. doi: 10.1039/c3em00320e.
10
Coarse root spatial distribution determined using a ground-penetrating radar technique in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest, China.利用探地雷达技术测定中国亚热带常绿阔叶林的粗根空间分布。
Sci China Life Sci. 2013 Nov;56(11):1038-46. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4560-7. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.一种利用能源部汉福德基地的两个案例研究来评估生态资源与风险的方法。
Environ Manage. 2017 Mar;59(3):357-372. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0798-8. Epub 2016 Nov 30.