Ciaramidaro Angela, Bölte Sven, Schlitt Sabine, Hainz Daniela, Poustka Fritz, Weber Bernhard, Bara Bruno G, Freitag Christine, Walter Henrik
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/M, Germany;
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/M, Germany; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jan;41(1):171-9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu124. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
Both schizophrenia (SCZ) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are characterized by mentalizing problems and associated neural dysfunction of the social brain. However, the deficits in mental state attribution are somehow opposed: Whereas patients with SCZ tend to over-attribute intentions to agents and physical events ("hyper-intentionality"), patients with autism treat people as devoid of intentions ("hypo-intentionality"). Here we aimed to investigate whether this hypo-hyper-intentionality hypothesis can be supported by neural evidence during a mentalizing task. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated the neural responses and functional connectivity during reading others intention. Scanning was performed in 23 individuals with ASD, 18 with paranoid SCZ and 23 gender and IQ matched control subjects. Both clinical groups showed reduced brain activation compared to controls for the contrast intentional vs physical information processing in left posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) and ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC) for SCZ, and right pSTS in ASD. As predicted, these effects were caused in a group specific way: Relative increased activation for physical information processing in SCZ that was also correlated with positive PANNS score and relative decreased activation for intentional information processing in ASD. Additionally, we could demonstrate opposed connectivity patterns between the right pSTS and vMPFC in the clinical groups, ie, increased for SCZ, decreased for ASD. These findings represent opposed neural signatures in key regions of the social brain as predicted by the hyper-hypo-intentionality hypothesis.
精神分裂症(SCZ)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)均以心理理论问题及社交脑区相关神经功能障碍为特征。然而,心理状态归因方面的缺陷在某种程度上是相反的:SCZ患者往往将意图过度归因于主体和物理事件(“过度意向性”),而自闭症患者则认为他人没有意图(“低意向性”)。在此,我们旨在研究在心理理论任务中,这种低-过度意向性假说是否能得到神经学证据的支持。我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)技术,在个体阅读他人意图时研究其神经反应和功能连接。对23名ASD患者、18名偏执型SCZ患者以及23名性别和智商匹配的对照受试者进行了扫描。与对照组相比,两个临床组在左侧后颞上沟(pSTS)和腹内侧前额叶皮质(vMPFC)(SCZ组)以及右侧pSTS(ASD组)中,在对比处理意向性信息与物理信息时,大脑激活均减少。正如预期的那样,这些效应以特定组别的方式产生:SCZ组中处理物理信息时相对激活增加,且与阳性PANNS评分相关;而ASD组中处理意向性信息时相对激活减少。此外,我们还证明了临床组中右侧pSTS和vMPFC之间存在相反的连接模式,即SCZ组增加,ASD组减少。这些发现代表了社交脑关键区域中与高-低意向性假说预测一致的相反神经特征。