Miller Stephannie K, Aberegg Lauren, Blasiole Kimberly, Parker Michael, Fulton Judith
Akron General Medical Center, Wound Center, Akron, OH; email:
summer fellowship student, Akron General Medical Center, Wound Center, Akron, OH.
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014 Sep;60(9):52-9.
Prolonged, unrelieved pressure is a major risk factor for pressure ulceration, and interface tissue pressures have been shown to be very high when a person is sitting. Using convenience sampling methods, 23 healthy participants (four men, 19 women, mean age 45 years, body mass index [BMI] range 20-45) participated in a prospective pilot study to evaluate the effect of BMI and two commonly used seating positions in standard hospital reclining chairs on tissue (especially sacral) interface pressures. Measurements were obtained when volunteers were seated upright with plantar surfaces of feet touching the floor (Position 1) and reclining with legs resting on an elevated surface (Position 2). Measurements were obtained for 6 minutes using a thin, flexible force sensing array 430-mm x 430-mm seat mat. Average pressure, maximum pressure, and the number of sensors reading >60 mm Hg and >80 mm Hg were used for analysis across the total surface and at the sacrum. Participants were categorized by BMI (category 1: 20-22, category 2: 23-28, category 3: 29+; no participants had a BMI <20). Leg elevation reduced average pressure across the total surface (from 42.9 mm Hg to 40.0 mm Hg, P = 0.015) and the number of sensors reading >60 mm Hg at the sacrum (from 31.4 to 27.1, P = 0.047). BMI and position were significantly correlated with the number of sensors reading >80 mm Hg (P = 0.008) and average pressure (P = 0.031). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences existed between BMI categories 1 (average delta: -3.63, indicating down position is better) and 3 (average delta: 4.67, indicating up position is better) for the difference in number of sensors above 80 mm Hg (P = 0.030). Research is needed to further explore the relationship between BMI and tissue pressure, but the results of this study suggest that for patients with a BMI >29, elevating the heels/reclining the chair significantly reduces sacral tissue interface pressure. Further research specific to pressure relief in the sitting position is needed, as neither position examined in this study was found to reduce interface pressures to generally considered safe levels for reduced-mobility patients.
长期、未缓解的压力是压疮形成的主要风险因素,并且当人坐着时,界面组织压力已被证明非常高。采用便利抽样方法,23名健康参与者(4名男性,19名女性,平均年龄45岁,体重指数[BMI]范围为20 - 45)参与了一项前瞻性试点研究,以评估BMI以及标准医院躺椅中两种常用坐姿对组织(尤其是骶部)界面压力的影响。当志愿者双脚足底触地直立就座(姿势1)以及双腿搁在抬高表面上斜躺(姿势2)时进行测量。使用一个430毫米×430毫米的薄型柔性力传感阵列座垫进行6分钟的测量。分析了整个表面和骶部的平均压力、最大压力以及读数>60毫米汞柱和>80毫米汞柱的传感器数量。参与者按BMI分类(类别1:20 - 22,类别2:23 - 28,类别3:29及以上;没有BMI<20的参与者)。腿部抬高降低了整个表面的平均压力(从42.9毫米汞柱降至40.0毫米汞柱,P = 0.015)以及骶部读数>60毫米汞柱的传感器数量(从31.4降至27.1,P = 0.047)。BMI和姿势与读数>80毫米汞柱的传感器数量(P = 0.008)和平均压力(P = 0.031)显著相关。两两比较显示,对于读数高于80毫米汞柱的传感器数量差异,BMI类别1(平均差值:-3.63,表明向下姿势更好)和类别3(平均差值:4.67,表明向上姿势更好)之间存在显著差异(P = 0.030)。需要进一步研究以探索BMI与组织压力之间的关系,但本研究结果表明,对于BMI>29的患者,抬高脚跟/倾斜椅子可显著降低骶部组织界面压力。由于本研究中所检查的两种姿势均未将界面压力降低到行动不便患者通常认为的安全水平,因此需要针对坐姿减压进行进一步的具体研究。