• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓冲性粘贴敷料和静态体位对骶骨界面压力的影响。

The Effect of Padded Adhesive Dressing and Static Body Position on Sacral Interface Pressure.

机构信息

From the Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.

Albany Medical Center Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Albany, New York.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1851-e1854. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000728.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000728
PMID:32569097
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Padded adhesive bandages are frequently used in the inpatient setting for sacral pressure injury prevention, but it is unclear whether they truly decrease interface pressure. We hypothesized such devices reduce sacral peak interface pressure in the supine position, which would be further reduced in 30-degree reclined and upright seated positions.

METHODS

Study participants rested with their sacrum on a pressure-sensing mat, in 3 positions, for 30 seconds each: (1) sitting upright; (2) supine; and (3) supine against 30-degree wedge. Measurements were made with and without a padded adhesive bandage overlying the sacrum. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were collected. These variables were entered sequentially, in an a priori order to construct a linear mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty healthy adults participated. After controlling for by-subject variation, age, and sex, BMI did not influence peak sacral pressure (P = 0.22), although the effect of body position was significant (P < 0.01). Subsequent addition of padded adhesive dressing was nonsignificant (P = 0.17); sacral peak pressure was similar with a padded adhesive dressing (247.8 ± 147.3 mm Hg) or without (mean ± standard deviation = 229.8 ± 127.7 mm Hg). Lastly, there was no significant interaction between BMI and body position (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Padded adhesive bandages did not reduce interface pressure in any position. Sacral pressure was highest in the supine position and was not specifically affected by BMI. If padded bandages provide clinically significant reduction in pressure injury incidence, it is not simply through the reduction of interface pressure.

摘要

目的

软垫粘性绷带常用于住院环境中预防骶部压力性损伤,但尚不清楚它们是否确实能降低界面压力。我们假设这些装置能降低仰卧位时骶部的峰值界面压力,而在 30 度倾斜卧位和直立坐姿时压力进一步降低。

方法

研究参与者将骶骨放在压力感应垫上,分别在 3 个位置各休息 30 秒:(1)坐直;(2)仰卧;(3)仰卧位靠 30 度楔形垫。在骶骨上覆盖软垫粘性绷带和不覆盖时分别进行测量。记录年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI)。按先验顺序依次输入这些变量,构建线性混合效应模型。

结果

40 名健康成年人参与了研究。在控制个体差异、年龄和性别后,BMI 对骶骨峰值压力没有影响(P=0.22),尽管体位的影响是显著的(P<0.01)。随后加入软垫粘性敷料的影响不显著(P=0.17);使用和不使用软垫粘性敷料时,骶骨峰值压力相似(分别为 247.8±147.3mmHg 和 229.8±127.7mmHg)。最后,BMI 和体位之间没有显著的交互作用(P=0.11)。

结论

软垫粘性绷带在任何体位都没有降低界面压力。仰卧位时骶部压力最高,BMI 对其没有特殊影响。如果软垫绷带能显著降低压疮的发生率,那么这并不是通过降低界面压力来实现的。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Padded Adhesive Dressing and Static Body Position on Sacral Interface Pressure.缓冲性粘贴敷料和静态体位对骶骨界面压力的影响。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1851-e1854. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000728.
2
A prospective assessment of sacral pressures in healthy volunteers seated upright and reclined with legs elevated in a recliner.对健康志愿者在躺椅上直立坐姿和腿部抬高的斜躺姿势下的骶骨压力进行前瞻性评估。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014 Sep;60(9):52-9.
3
Effectiveness of a multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing as prevention for sacral pressure ulcers in at-risk in-patients: Randomized controlled trial.多层面硅酮-黏附性聚亚安酯泡沫敷料预防高危住院患者骶部压疮的效果:随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Mar;127:104172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104172. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
4
Reducing the Risk for Pressure Injury During Combat Evacuation.降低战斗后送期间发生压疮的风险。
Crit Care Nurse. 2018 Apr;38(2):38-45. doi: 10.4037/ccn2018223.
5
The Effect of Offloading Heels on Sacral Pressure.减轻足跟压力对骶骨压力的影响。
AORN J. 2017 Sep;106(3):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2017.07.002.
6
Comparing the effects of three different multilayer dressings for pressure ulcer prevention on sacral skin after prolonged loading: An exploratory crossover trial.比较三种不同多层敷料预防压疮对长时间受压后骶部皮肤的影响:一项探索性交叉试验。
Wound Repair Regen. 2021 Mar;29(2):270-279. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12883. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
7
Effectiveness of prophylactic sacral protective dressings to prevent pressure injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性骶部保护敷料预防压力性损伤的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Dec;100:103400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103400. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Variations in sacral sub-epidermal moisture measurements in hospitalized medical and surgical patients: A longitudinal observational sub-study.住院患者骶部皮下水分测量的变化:一项纵向观察性子研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Sep;145:104545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104545. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.体重、体位、支撑面与骶骨处组织界面压力之间的关系。
Decubitus. 1993 Jan;6(1):22-30.
10
Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.对处于仰卧位和45度福勒位的受试者的支撑面进行界面压力测量。
J ET Nurs. 1993 May-Jun;20(3):111-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Body Composition on Supine Pressure Distribution in Bed: A Comparison Between Young and Older Adults.身体成分对卧位时床上压力分布的影响:年轻人与老年人的比较
Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88987. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88987. eCollection 2025 Jul.