Lam Lawrence T
Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 Nov;16(11):508. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0508-2.
Internet gaming addiction was included in the latest version of the DSM-V as a possible disorder recently, while debate is still on-going as to whether the condition called "Internet Addiction" (IA) could be fully recognised as an established disorder. The major contention is how well IA could fulfil the validation criteria as a psychiatric disorder as in other well-established behavioural addictions. In addition to various proposed validation criteria, evidence of risk and protective factors as well as development of outcomes from longitudinal and prospective studies are suggested as important. A systematic review of available longitudinal and prospective studies was conducted to gather epidemiological evidence on risk and protective factors of IA and the health effect of IA on adolescents. Nine articles were identified after an extensive search of the literature in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. Of these, eight provided data on risk or protective factors of IA and one focused solely on the effects of IA on mental health. Information was extracted and analysed systematically from each study and tabulated. Many exposure variables were studied and could be broadly classified into three main categories: psychopathologies of the participants, family and parenting factors, and others such as Internet usage, motivation, and academic performance. Some were found to be potential risk or protective factors of IA. It was also found that exposure to IA had a detrimental effect on the mental health of young people. These results were discussed in light of their implications to the fulfilment of the validation criteria.
网络游戏成瘾最近被纳入最新版的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-V),被视为一种可能存在的疾病,然而对于所谓的“网络成瘾”(IA)能否被完全认定为一种既定疾病,相关争论仍在继续。主要争议在于IA作为一种精神疾病,在多大程度上能够满足像其他已确定的行为成瘾那样的验证标准。除了各种提出的验证标准外,风险和保护因素的证据以及纵向和前瞻性研究的结果发展也被认为很重要。我们对现有的纵向和前瞻性研究进行了系统综述,以收集关于IA的风险和保护因素以及IA对青少年健康影响的流行病学证据。按照PRISMA指南对文献进行广泛检索后,共确定了9篇文章。其中,8篇提供了关于IA风险或保护因素的数据,1篇仅关注IA对心理健康的影响。从每项研究中系统提取并分析信息,并制成表格。研究了许多暴露变量,大致可分为三大类:参与者的精神病理学、家庭和养育因素,以及其他如互联网使用、动机和学业成绩等。其中一些被发现是IA的潜在风险或保护因素。研究还发现,接触IA对年轻人的心理健康有不利影响。我们根据这些结果对验证标准的影响进行了讨论。