Ghaderi Nima, Marcus R A
Noyes Laboratory of Chemical Physics, California Institute of Technology , 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
J Phys Chem A. 2014 Nov 6;118(44):10166-78. doi: 10.1021/jp506788z. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
We consider for bimolecular recombination reactions the K-adiabatic versus the K-active forms of RRKM theory, where K is the component of the total angular momentum along the axis of least moment of inertia of the recombination product. When that product is approximately a prolate symmetric top, with two moments of inertia of the product substantially larger than the third, K becomes a dynamically slowly varying quantity and the K-adiabatic form of RRKM theory is the appropriate version to use. Using classical trajectory results for the rate constant for ozone formation in the low-pressure region as an example, excellent agreement for the recombination rate constant k(rec) with the K-adiabatic RRKM theory is observed. Use of a two transition state (inner, outer TS) formalism also obviates any need for assessing recrossings in the exit channel. In contrast, the K-active form of RRKM theory for this system disagrees with the trajectory results by a factor of about 2.5. In this study we also consider the distribution of the (E, J) resolved time-dependent survival probabilities P(E, J, t) of the intermediate O3* formed from O + O2. It is calculated using classical trajectories. The initial conditions for classical trajectories were selected using action-angle variables and a total J representation for (E, J) resolved systems, as described in Part I.1 The difference between K-active and K-adiabatic treatments is reflected also in a difference of the K-active RRKM survival probability P(E, J, t) from its trajectory-based value and from its often non-single-exponential decay. It is shown analytically that krec (K-active) ≥ k(rec) (K-adiabatic), independent of the details of the TS (e.g., variational or fixed RRKM theory, 1-TS or 2-TS). Nonstatistical effects for O3* formation include a small initial recrossing of the transition state, a slow (several picoseconds) equipartitioning of energy among the two O-O bonds of the newly formed O3*, and a small nondissociation (a quasi-periodicity) of some trajectories originating in O3* (∼ 10%) and so, by microscopic reversibility, are not accessible from O + O2. An apparently new feature of the present results is the comparison of classical trajectories with K-adiabatic and K-active theories for rate constants of bimolecular recombinations. The quantum mechanical counterpart of classical K-adiabatic RRKM theory is also given, and its comparison with the experimental k(rec) for O3 is given elsewhere.
对于双分子重组反应,我们考虑RRKM理论的K绝热形式与K活性形式,其中K是总角动量沿重组产物最小转动惯量轴的分量。当该产物近似为长轴对称陀螺,且产物的两个转动惯量远大于第三个转动惯量时,K成为动态缓慢变化的量,RRKM理论的K绝热形式是适用的版本。以低压区域臭氧形成速率常数的经典轨迹结果为例,观察到重组速率常数k(rec)与K绝热RRKM理论有很好的一致性。使用双过渡态(内、外过渡态)形式主义也避免了评估出射通道中再穿越的任何需求。相比之下,该系统的RRKM理论的K活性形式与轨迹结果相差约2.5倍。在本研究中,我们还考虑了由O + O2形成的中间产物O3的(E, J)分辨的时间相关存活概率P(E, J, t)的分布。它是用经典轨迹计算的。如第一部分所述,经典轨迹的初始条件是使用作用角变量和(E, J)分辨系统的总J表示来选择的。K活性处理和K绝热处理之间的差异也反映在K活性RRKM存活概率P(E, J, t)与其基于轨迹的值以及其通常非单指数衰减之间的差异上。分析表明,krec(K活性)≥ k(rec)(K绝热),与过渡态的细节无关(例如,变分或固定RRKM理论,单过渡态或双过渡态)。O3形成的非统计效应包括过渡态的小初始再穿越、新形成的O3的两个O - O键之间能量的缓慢(几皮秒)均分,以及一些源自O3的轨迹的小非解离(准周期性)(约10%),因此,根据微观可逆性,从O + O2无法得到这些轨迹。本结果一个明显的新特点是将经典轨迹与双分子重组速率常数的K绝热和K活性理论进行比较。还给出了经典K绝热RRKM理论的量子力学对应物,并在其他地方给出了其与O3实验k(rec)的比较。